mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Moral Gap of Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.18523 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.CY cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Moral foundation detection is crucial for analyzing social discourse and developing ethically-aligned AI systems. While large language models excel across diverse tasks, their performance on specialized moral reasoning remains unclear. This study provides the first comprehensive comparison between state-of-the-art LLMs and fine-tuned transformers across Twitter and Reddit datasets using ROC, PR, and DET curve analysis. Results reveal substantial performance gaps, with LLMs exhibiting high false negative rates and systematic under-detection of moral content despite prompt engineering efforts. These findings demonstrate that task-specific fine-tuning remains superior to prompting for moral reasoning applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.

Builds on

5 of 21 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 253
  2. 2020Moral Framing and Ideological Bias of Newscited by 29
  3. 2024MoralBERT: A Fine-Tuned Language Model for Capturing Moral Values in Social Discussionscited by 23
  4. 2023Measuring Moral Dimensions in Social Media with Mformercited by 13
  5. 2022Mapping Topics in 100,000 Real-life Moral Dilemmascited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.