mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

InsightSeg: Reusing Correction Insights for Guideline-Consistent Segmentation

arXiv 2609.02002 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Guideline-consistent semantic segmentation requires more than category recognition, as real-world labeling policies demand fine-grained, task-specific decisions. Recent multi-agent refinement systems improve compliance with such textual guidelines by detecting and correcting errors. However, they are stateless: feedback from the critiquing agent is discarded, causing the same guideline-specific mistakes to be repeatedly rediscovered and corrected across the dataset at the cost of additional refinement. We introduce InsightSeg, an episodic memory mechanism that converts successful correction episodes into reusable, visually grounded insights. A meta-analyzer distills each qualifying episode into directive natural-language insights and anchors them to the local image regions that caused the error using patch-level visual concept vectors. On subsequent images, these concepts are matched against dense patch embeddings to retrieve relevant insights, which condition the segmenting agent before making its first prediction. This shifts the system from correcting recurring errors to preventing them, improving segmentation quality before any refinement occurs. Across Waymo and Cityscapes, InsightSeg improves both first-pass and final guideline-consistent segmentation performance while requiring fewer refinement steps, demonstrating that multi-agent refinement can become more accurate and efficient by drawing on past correction experience.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  7. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  8. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  9. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  10. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 914
  11. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
  12. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
13 more
  1. 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 560
  2. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
  3. 2023Personalize Segment Anything Model with One Shotcited by 250
  4. 2025Seg-Zero: Reasoning-Chain Guided Segmentation via Cognitive Reinforcementcited by 234
  5. 2023JARVIS-1: Open-World Multi-task Agents with Memory-Augmented Multimodal Language Modelscited by 170
  6. 2023Matcher: Segment Anything with One Shot Using All-Purpose Feature Matchingcited by 142
  7. 2024Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkerscited by 53
  8. 2021Iterative Shrinking for Referring Expression Grounding Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  9. 2024Can Large Vision-Language Models Correct Semantic Grounding Errors By Themselves?cited by 20
  10. 2024ScanFormer: Referring Expression Comprehension by Iteratively Scanningcited by 18
  11. 2025RSAgent: Learning to Reason and Act for Text-Guided Segmentation via Multi-Turn Tool Invocationscited by 5
  12. 2025Guideline-Consistent Segmentation via Multi-Agent Refinementcited by 2
  13. 2026Reason Twice: Segmentation via Candidate Discovery and Comparative Reasoningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.