mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient SWE Agent Benchmarking via Trajectory-Aware Evaluation

arXiv 2609.01603 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating software engineering agents on realistic benchmarks is costly, since each task may require multi-step code exploration, modification, and test execution. Existing efficient evaluation methods select representative subsets to estimate full-benchmark performance, but are largely result-only: they fit historical pass/fail response matrices or static task semantics, discarding how agents solve problems. We propose PTA-IRT, a Privileged Trajectory-Aware Item Response Theory framework that fuses process and outcome signals. Historical execution trajectories supply process-level evidence beyond pass/fail, such as explored context, attempted edits, and solving paths, which PTA-IRT uses as privileged information for calibration subset selection and ability estimation. Under low calibration budgets, PTA-IRT consistently outperforms prior IRT baselines on score and ranking recovery across four SWE benchmarks. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/PTA-IRT.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 38 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

38 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Agents in Software Engineering: Survey, Landscape, and Vision13 Sep
  2. 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey4 Sep
  3. 2024CoSQA+: Pioneering the Multi-Choice Code Search Benchmark with Test-Driven Agents17 Jun
  4. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  5. 2024MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue Resolution26 Mar

Other references · 33

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  4. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
  5. 2015Unifying distillation and privileged informationcited by 218
  6. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
  7. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  8. 2024LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigationcited by 92
  9. 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
  10. 2024DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 74
  11. 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
  12. 2020Learning with Privileged Information for Efficient Image Super-Resolutioncited by 53
21 more
  1. 2025Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theorycited by 42
  2. 2024metabench -- A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 35
  3. 2020Variational Item Response Theory: Fast, Accurate, and Expressivecited by 29
  4. 2022RACE: Retrieval-Augmented Commit Message Generationcited by 27
  5. 2024HumanEvo: An Evolution-aware Benchmark for More Realistic Evaluation of Repository-level Code Generationcited by 26
  6. 2025OmniGIRL: A Multilingual and Multimodal Benchmark for GitHub Issue Resolutioncited by 24
  7. 2025What to Retrieve for Effective Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation? An Empirical Study and Beyondcited by 22
  8. 2024RepoTransBench: A Real-World Multilingual Benchmark for Repository-Level Code Translationcited by 21
  9. 2021Do Question Answering Modeling Improvements Hold Across Benchmarks?cited by 20
  10. 2024Top General Performance = Top Domain Performance? DomainCodeBench: A Multi-domain Code Generation Benchmarkcited by 13
  11. 2026RealSec-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Secure Code Generation in Real-World Repositoriescited by 13
  12. 2023The Validity of Evaluation Results: Assessing Concurrence Across Compositionality Benchmarkscited by 12
  13. 2024You Augment Me: Exploring ChatGPT-based Data Augmentation for Semantic Code Searchcited by 11
  14. 2025Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Tailored Benchmarks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 11
  15. 2025Towards an Understanding of Context Utilization in Code Intelligencecited by 10
  16. 2026AlignCoder: Aligning Retrieval with Target Intent for Repository-Level Code Completioncited by 7
  17. 2025SWE-Factory: Your Automated Factory for Issue Resolution Training Data and Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 6
  18. 2026RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Modelscited by 5
  19. 2025AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMscited by 3
  20. 2026ShortCoder: Knowledge-Augmented Syntax Optimization for Token-Efficient Code Generationcited by 3
  21. 2026DRAINCODE: Stealthy Energy Consumption Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation via Context Poisoningcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Trajectory-Aware Benchmark Subset Selection for Cost-Efficient Software Engineering Agent Regression Testing
  2. 2026SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle
  3. 2026SWE-TRACE: Optimizing Long-Horizon SWE Agents Through Rubric Process Reward Models and Heuristic Test-Time Scaling
  4. 2026PERFOPT-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Software Performance Optimization
  5. 2026SWE-Bench Pro Verified: A Reliable Benchmark for Software Engineering Agents
  6. 2026SWE-Next: Scalable Real-World Software Engineering Tasks for Agents
  7. 2026SWE-Replay: Efficient Test-Time Scaling for Software Engineering Agents
  8. 2026Benchmarks are Not Enough: RAMP for Runtime Assessing of Agentic Models in Production Systems