Position Matters: Feature Inversion Attacks in ViT Split Inference with Token Reduction and Shuffling
On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Token pruning and merging for ViTs
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Transformers (ViTs) are increasingly used in split-inference systems, where edge devices transmit intermediate token representations to a remote cloud. In this setting, token reduction lowers computation and communication costs, while token shuffling disrupts the spatial organization of the transmitted tokens, potentially limiting information leakage. However, their privacy benefits remain unclear against feature inversion attacks, which attempt to reconstruct the input from the transmitted embeddings. In this work, we show that, despite disrupting the spatial structure required by conventional reconstruction attacks, transmitted token embeddings retain substantial positional information. Based on this observation, we introduce the Spatially Aligned Reconstruction Attack (SARA), a unified pipeline that predicts token positions, restores their spatial layout, reconstructs missing embeddings using a feature-space masked autoencoder, and recovers the input image. Our results demonstrate that token shuffling provides only apparent privacy, as SARA largely reconstructs the original token organization. Token reduction offers stronger protection, but significant leakage persists when the retained tokens preserve sufficient semantic and positional information. Finally, we introduce a lightweight edge-side defense that removes positional embeddings and progressively adapts the edge-side transformer blocks through knowledge distillation. It substantially reduces attack performance against SARA, while preserving downstream task accuracy and requiring no changes to the cloud-side model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Token pruning and merging for ViTs, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Adaptive Token Merging for Efficient Transformer Semantic Communication at the Edge12 Sep
- 2023Token Fusion: Bridging the Gap between Token Pruning and Token Merging2 Dec
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Faster17 Oct
Other references · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
- 2022SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 51
- 2023A survey on efficient vision transformers: algorithms, techniques, and performance benchmarkingcited by 41
- 2023Permutation Equivariance of Transformers and Its Applicationscited by 20
- 2021PRICURE: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Inference in a Multi-Party Settingcited by 9
- 2023PATROL: Privacy-Oriented Pruning for Collaborative Inference Against Model Inversion Attackscited by 9
- 2024Make Split, not Hijack: Preventing Feature-Space Hijacking Attacks in Split Learningcited by 6
- 2025DRAG: Data Reconstruction Attack using Guided Diffusioncited by 3
- 2026From Pixels to Privacy: Temporally Consistent Video Anonymization via Token Pruning for Privacy Preserving Action Recognitioncited by 2
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shift
- 2025What Your Features Reveal: Data-Efficient Black-Box Feature Inversion Attack for Split DNNs
- 2025Token Compression Meets Compact Vision Transformers: A Survey and Comparative Evaluation for Edge AI
- 2025CubistMerge: Spatial-Preserving Token Merging For Diverse ViT Backbones
- 2026RAPID: Layer-Wise Redundancy-Aware Pruning and Importance-Driven Token Merging for Efficient ViT
- 2026Less Is More -- Until It Breaks: Security Pitfalls of Vision Token Compression in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026R'enyi Entropy: A New Token Pruning Metric for Vision Transformers
- 2026When Token Compression Breaks: Structural Pruning vs. Token Reduction for Robust ViT Segmentation under High Compression