mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Make Split, not Hijack: Preventing Feature-Space Hijacking Attacks in Split Learning

arXiv 2404.09265 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The popularity of Machine Learning (ML) makes the privacy of sensitive data more imperative than ever. Collaborative learning techniques like Split Learning (SL) aim to protect client data while enhancing ML processes. Though promising, SL has been proved to be vulnerable to a plethora of attacks, thus raising concerns about its effectiveness on data privacy. In this work, we introduce a hybrid approach combining SL and Function Secret Sharing (FSS) to ensure client data privacy. The client adds a random mask to the activation map before sending it to the servers. The servers cannot access the original function but instead work with shares generated using FSS. Consequently, during both forward and backward propagation, the servers cannot reconstruct the client's raw data from the activation map. Furthermore, through visual invertibility, we demonstrate that the server is incapable of reconstructing the raw image data from the activation map when using FSS. It enhances privacy by reducing privacy leakage compared to other SL-based approaches where the server can access client input information. Our approach also ensures security against feature space hijacking attack, protecting sensitive information from potential manipulation. Our protocols yield promising results, reducing communication overhead by over 2x and training time by over 7x compared to the same model with FSS, without any SL. Also, we show that our approach achieves >96% accuracy and remains equivalent to the plaintext models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2024.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  2. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  3. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
  4. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
  5. 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 310
  6. 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 279
  7. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  8. 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 105
  9. 2020Can We Use Split Learning on 1D CNN Models for Privacy Preserving Training?cited by 50
  10. 2019QUOTIENT: Two-Party Secure Neural Network Training and Predictioncited by 41
  11. 2022ResSFL: A Resistance Transfer Framework for Defending Model Inversion Attack in Split Federated Learningcited by 36
  12. 2020ARIANN: Low-Interaction Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning via Function Secret Sharingcited by 20
4 more
  1. 2021Blind Faith: Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning using Function Approximationcited by 10
  2. 2023Love or Hate? Share or Split? Privacy-Preserving Training Using Split Learning and Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 8
  3. 2023Learning in the Dark: Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning using Function Approximationcited by 6
  4. 2024Wildest Dreams: Reproducible Research in Privacy-preserving Neural Network Trainingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.