mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less Is More -- Until It Breaks: Security Pitfalls of Vision Token Compression in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2601.12042 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Visual token compression is widely adopted to improve the inference efficiency of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), enabling their deployment in latency-sensitive and resource-constrained scenarios. However, existing work has mainly focused on efficiency and performance, while the security implications of visual token compression remain largely unexplored. In this work, we first reveal that visual token compression substantially degrades the robustness of LVLMs: models that are robust under uncompressed inference become highly vulnerable once compression is enabled. These vulnerabilities are state-specific; failure modes emerge only in the compressed setting and completely disappear when compression is disabled, making them particularly hidden and difficult to diagnose. By analyzing the key stages of the compression process, we identify instability in token importance ranking as the primary cause of this robustness degradation. Small and imperceptible perturbations can significantly alter token rankings, leading the compression mechanism to mistakenly discard task-critical information and ultimately causing model failure. Motivated by this observation, we propose a Compression-Aware Attack to systematically study and exploit this vulnerability. CAA directly targets the token selection mechanism and induces failures exclusively under compressed inference. We further extend this approach to more realistic black-box settings and introduce Transfer CAA, where neither the target model nor the compression configuration is accessible. We further evaluate potential defenses and find that they provide only limited protection. Extensive experiments across models, datasets, and compression methods show that visual token compression significantly undermines robustness, revealing a previously overlooked efficiency-security trade-off.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

31 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Q-MLLM: Vector Quantization for Robust Multimodal Large Language Model Security20 Nov
  2. 2025A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o113 Mar
  3. 2024Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models21 Jul
  4. 2024Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially Fast13 Feb
  5. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun

Other references · 26

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  5. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  7. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  8. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  9. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  10. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,033
  11. 2024Long Context Transfer from Language to Visioncited by 502
  12. 2025Native Sparse Attention: Hardware-Aligned and Natively Trainable Sparse Attentioncited by 391
14 more
  1. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  2. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 288
  3. 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reductioncited by 283
  4. 2024A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AIcited by 274
  5. 2023Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtimecited by 165
  6. 2024Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inferencecited by 137
  7. 2020RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 94
  8. 2024A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Small VLM is a Precise Guidance for Accelerating Large VLMscited by 35
  9. 2025A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 34
  10. 2023Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddingscited by 28
  11. 2024Accelerating Multimodal Large Language Models by Searching Optimal Vision Token Reductioncited by 28
  12. 2025A Survey of Token Compression for Efficient Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 22
  13. 2024ST3: Accelerating Multimodal Large Language Model by Spatial-Temporal Visual Token Trimmingcited by 20
  14. 2024Token Compensator: Altering Inference Cost of Vision Transformer without Re-Tuningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026On the Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models under Visual Token Compression
  2. 2026Visual Token Compression Enhances Robustness of MLLMs
  3. 2025Variation-aware Vision Token Dropping for Faster Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Hybrid Token Compression for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Not All Visual Tokens Are Equally Safe to Remove:Consequence-Sensitive Visual Token Compression
  6. 2026Prune Redundancy, Preserve Essence: Vision Token Compression in VLMs via Synergistic Importance-Diversity
  7. 2025High-Entropy Tokens as Multimodal Failure Points in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Are We Using the Right Benchmark: An Evaluation Framework for Visual Token Compression Methods