Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improves LLM reasoning but often causes a drop in policy entropy, leading to narrowed reasoning coverage and degraded pass@k for large k. While existing methods mitigate this entropy collapse through algorithmic regularizations, cross-model non-parametric perturbation is also neglected. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective approach to preserve the generative diversity of LLMs during RLVR. Instead of relying solely on internal exploration, we force the target model to generate answers based on partial reasoning trajectories generated by a smaller, weaker language models. These unfamiliar prefixes effectively disrupt over-confidence and encourage the exploration of distinct reasoning paths. We empirically study the potential of outer prefixes, revealing the mechanism of the impact of distributional discrepancy to the exploration dynamics in RLVR training. Experiments across multiple mathematical benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms vanilla RLVR. Notably, the performance gain becomes increasingly pronounced as k scales up, demonstrating a substantial expansion of reasoning coverage. Furthermore, our approach efficiently mitigates entropy collapse without requiring additional SFT, intricate reward designs, or complex prompting.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Beyond Pass@1: Self-Play with Variational Problem Synthesis Sustains RLVR19 Aug
- 2025Pass@k Training for Adaptively Balancing Exploration and Exploitation of Large Reasoning Models14 Aug
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance21 Apr
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 9
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 889
- 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
- 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 97
- 2024Beyond Examples: High-level Automated Reasoning Paradigm in In-Context Learning via MCTScited by 54
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026How You Begin is How You Reason: Driving Exploration in RLVR via Prefix-Tuned Priors
- 2025From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVR
- 2026SAGE: Shaping Anchors for Guided Exploration in RLVR of LLMs
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward
- 2026Back to Basics: Revisiting Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning via Generative Probabilities
- 2026On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation
- 2026BODHI: Do LLMs Branch Out and Discover Heterogeneous Inferences?
- 2025Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models