Astar: Learning to Propose Evolution Directions for Self-Evolving Industrial AI Systems
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Self-evolving LLM agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern AI systems advance through continuous iteration: a loop of proposing evolution directions, implementing code, training, and evaluation. While the latter three stages are increasingly automated, the starting point --- proposing effective evolution directions --- remains a critical bottleneck that still relies heavily on senior experts. In this work, we explore whether AI can take over this role. We find that general-purpose LLMs, even the advanced GPT-5.5, offer only generic and misaligned suggestions: the required expertise is accumulated through experience rather than explicitly codified, and thus hard to inject directly. To this end, we propose Astar, a training-based approach that learns a specialized evolution-guiding model from the abundant iteration histories of industrial systems. Realizing this idea, however, raises four challenges: sparse supervision, noisy data, a vast direction space, and prohibitively expensive verification. We address them along two fronts. On the data side, we design a pipeline that turns noisy historical commits into a large, clean evolutionary corpus via pairwise sample expansion and noise filtering. On the model side, we train the model through mid-training, SFT, and RL, guiding evolution direction generation with hierarchical hints and using the reward model in RL as a fast surrogate evaluator. Astar has been deployed in Alibaba's Lazada advertising system for evolution direction proposal. Astar-8B achieves a single-proposal success rate of 0.6786 in real-execution evaluation, far exceeding human experts (0.3229) and the strongest general-purpose LLM (0.3071). More importantly, Astar closes the loop and enables fully automatic iteration: it guided 20 consecutive iterations over two weeks, improving offline Hitrate@200 by 23.6%, while an online A/B test yielded relative lifts of 4.86% in GMV and 1.82% in advertising revenue.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Self-evolving LLM agents, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 51 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
51 of 60 references.
References · 51
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
38 more
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
- 2020CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languagescited by 1,310
- 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,184
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 964
- 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 867
- 2022Autoregressive Image Generation using Residual Quantizationcited by 722
- 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 717
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 434
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
- 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 265
- 2018code2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Codecited by 250
- 2017A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalnesscited by 221
- 2023Recommender Systems with Generative Retrievalcited by 198
- 2024Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendationscited by 188
- 2025OneRec: Unifying Retrieve and Rank with Generative Recommender and Iterative Preference Alignmentcited by 173
- 2024Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathologycited by 162
- 2025The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideascited by 62
- 2026The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligencecited by 61
- 2023EcomGPT: Instruction-tuning Large Language Models with Chain-of-Task Tasks for E-commercecited by 49
- 2025Midtraining Bridges Pretraining and Posttraining Distributionscited by 12
- 2026Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideascited by 10
- 2023Tune As You Scale: Hyperparameter Optimization For Compute Efficient Trainingcited by 9
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Meta-Reflective Evolution Effectively Improves Production AI Systems
- 2026ASI-Evolve: AI Accelerates AI
- 2026Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?
- 2026AdaptEvolve: Improving Efficiency of Evolutionary AI Agents through Adaptive Model Selection
- 2026Self-Evolving Algorithm-Design Agents: Escaping In-Context Evolutionary Stagnation via Population-Curated Policy Optimization
- 2026LLM-Evolved Domain-Independent Heuristics for Symbolic AI Planning
- 2024A Survey on Self-Evolution of Large Language Models
- 2026FreeEvolve: Learning to Evolve Beyond Fixed Loops