mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Agentic AI Scientific Community for Automated Neural Operator Discovery

arXiv 2607.12122 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an agentic approach to autonomous neural operator discovery based on an AI scientific community, which consists of a swarm of virtual laboratories that interact under a citation-based economy of influence. Highly-cited labs found new labs that follow their research direction and replace non-performing labs. Each virtual lab contains three agents: an LLM planner that proposes an architecture, a numerical worker that trains and measures it, and an LLM reviewer that participates in cross-lab peer review. All labs share a common vocabulary consisting of DeepONet (branch-trunk), Fourier, Transformer (attention), wavelet, and residual convolutional neural operator building blocks. We evaluate the neural operator AI scientific community on five problems, namely piecewise regression, the linear advection and Burgers 1D PDEs, and the Navier-Stokes and Darcy flow 2D PDEs, while repeating the simulation three times for each problem. The results show that the neural operator AI scientific community is capable of discovering high-accuracy, low-parameter-count neural operator architectures. All 9,623 LLM calls are logged and audited, which reveals that the virtual lab LLM planners choose to hybridize in 99.8% of their logged decisions, consistently returning multi-family hybrids. Moreover, we conducted an ablation study by replacing the LLM agents in each lab by rule-based alternatives, which caused the scientific community to collapse to non-hybridized single-family stacks in several cases, showing that LLM agency is needed to preserve diversity. The results suggest a no-free-lunch theorem for neural operators: there is no universal winner. The code, configurations, and the complete LLM transcripts are released at https://github.com/luislootx/AI-SC.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026The AI Scientific Community: Agentic Virtual Lab Swarms22 Mar
  2. 2025ATHENA: Agentic Team for Hierarchical Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms3 Dec

Other references · 19

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  4. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  6. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  7. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  8. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  9. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
  10. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
  11. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  12. 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 333
7 more
  1. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
  2. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 219
  3. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Researchcited by 150
  4. 2020AutoML-Zero: Evolving Machine Learning Algorithms From Scratchcited by 137
  5. 2023EvoPrompting: Language Models for Code-Level Neural Architecture Searchcited by 129
  6. 2023Can GPT-4 Perform Neural Architecture Search?cited by 74
  7. 2018SCORES: Shape Composition with Recursive Substructure Priorscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PDEFlow: Autonomous Agentic PDE Pipelines for Neural Operator Learning and Solver-Free Inference
  2. 2024NADER: Neural Architecture Design via Multi-Agent Collaboration
  3. 2026A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline
  4. 2025AgenticSciML: Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems for Emergent Discovery in Scientific Machine Learning
  5. 2023Operator Learning Meets Numerical Analysis: Improving Neural Networks through Iterative Methods
  6. 2026The Agentic Researcher: A Practical Guide to AI-Assisted Research in Mathematics and Machine Learning
  7. 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discovery
  8. 2026EvoPINN: Agentic Discovery of Executable Algorithms for Physics-Informed Neural Networks