mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?

arXiv 2608.25097 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.MM math-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how (multimodal) large language models perform on physics problems requires benchmarks that reflect the difficulty and breadth of expert-level physical reasoning. Existing physics benchmarks remain limited in the following two important ways: (1) short of high-difficulty datasets, and (2) lack of comprehensive coverage of visual forms, knowledge points, and step-by-step solution processes. As a result, model performance on current datasets may not be fully representative of their ability to solve complex physics problems. To address these issues, we present PhysElite, a large-scale bilingual multimodal benchmark for Olympiad-level physics reasoning. PhysElite contains 11,586 Olympiad-tier problems. For each problem, we provide corresponding visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese-English solution derivations, and the final answer. We benchmark 18 open-source and closed-source MLLMs, and find that even the strongest model reaches only 33.7% answer accuracy. We additionally conduct step-level process evaluation to diagnose where models fail in the reasoning chain. Our datasets are released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/physelite/PhysElite.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  5. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  6. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  7. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  8. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  9. 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 567
  10. 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 48
  11. 2025PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning?cited by 38
  12. 2025HiPhO: How Far Are (M)LLMs from Humans in the Latest High School Physics Olympiad Benchmark?cited by 19
3 more
  1. 2025PhysUniBench: A Multi-Modal Physics Reasoning Benchmark at Undergraduate Levelcited by 16
  2. 2025P1: Mastering Physics Olympiads with Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  3. 2025Benchmarking Foundation Models with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Olympic-Level Physics Problem Solvingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems
  2. 2025PhySense: Principle-Based Physics Reasoning Benchmarking for Large Language Models
  3. 2025Multi-Physics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal LLMs Reasoning on Chinese Multi-Subject Physics Problems
  4. 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
  5. 2025PHYBench: Holistic Evaluation of Physical Perception and Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2025ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems
  7. 2025PhysicsArena: The First Multimodal Physics Reasoning Benchmark Exploring Variable, Process, and Solution Dimensions
  8. 2025PhysicsEval: Inference-Time Techniques to Improve the Reasoning Proficiency of Large Language Models on Physics Problems