mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Method, Mind, and Morality: How People Make Sense of Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2608.24748 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixed-methods study with computational text analysis of millions of AI-related newspaper articles and social media posts grounded in 57 semi-structured interviews with AI professionals in 2021 and 2023--before and after the recent surge of public interest. We identify a range of sociological frames (interpretive schemas that structure collective cognition) and show how AI professionals use frames to address significant cognitive challenges, such as assigning responsibility for societal impacts. We develop a framework of three primary debates across which frames are adopted and contested: (i) the textitmethod of AI development, between frames of top-down expert systems and bottom-up emergent capabilities, (ii) the textitmind of an AI system, ranging from a passive tool to a humanlike "digital mind," and (iii) the textitmorality of how AI is used, particularly the decision of whether to slow down or speed up AI development. As humanity enters the era of transformative AI, technologists and policymakers must account for the framing dynamics that will circumscribe our beliefs, values, and actions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 206 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

Builds on

45 of 206 references.

References · 45

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  5. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  6. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  7. 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 294
  8. 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
  9. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  10. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
  11. 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 106
  12. 2022Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programmingcited by 91
33 more
  1. 2018The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddingscited by 87
  2. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  3. 2022Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biasescited by 60
  4. 2020Conceptual Metaphors Impact Perceptions of Human-AI Collaborationcited by 47
  5. 2023Spellburst: A Node-based Interface for Exploratory Creative Coding with Natural Language Promptscited by 30
  6. 2023How Knowledge Workers Think Generative AI Will (Not) Transform Their Industriescited by 30
  7. 2021Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Makingcited by 23
  8. 2026Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logscited by 23
  9. 2016Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligencecited by 22
  10. 2024The Impossibility of Fair LLMscited by 22
  11. 2024"If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" -- How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishmentcited by 19
  12. 2024Rambler: Supporting Writing With Speech via LLM-Assisted Gist Manipulationcited by 18
  13. 2023Causal Context Connects Counterfactual Fairness to Robust Prediction and Group Fairnesscited by 17
  14. 2023User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligencecited by 16
  15. 2024Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) Surveycited by 15
  16. 2025HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistantscited by 11
  17. 2021The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Reviewcited by 10
  18. 2021Guilty Artificial Mindscited by 9
  19. 2025Relational Norms for Human-AI Cooperationcited by 9
  20. 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Textcited by 9
  21. 2021Integrating topic modeling and word embedding to characterize violent deathscited by 8
  22. 2020Cultural Cartography with Word Embeddingscited by 7
  23. 2020Collecting the Public Perception of AI and Robot Rightscited by 7
  24. 2025Digital Companionship: Overlapping Uses of AI Companions and AI Assistantscited by 7
  25. 2024Which Artificial Intelligences Do People Care About Most? A Conjoint Experiment on Moral Considerationcited by 6
  26. 2024The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of Onecited by 6
  27. 2025Robots, Chatbots, Self-Driving Cars: Perceptions of Mind and Morality Across Artificial Intelligencescited by 6
  28. 2021Accelerating science with human versus alien artificial intelligencescited by 3
  29. 2025Public Opinion and The Rise of Digital Minds: Perceived Risk, Trust, and Regulation Supportcited by 3
  30. 2025Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AIcited by 3
  31. 2024Dismantling Gender Blindness in Online Discussion of a Crime/Gender Dichotomycited by 1
  32. 2024Assembling the Puzzle: Exploring Collaboration and Data Sensemaking in Nursing Practices for Remote Patient Monitoringcited by 1
  33. 2026Effects of Generative AI Errors on User Reliance Across Task Difficultycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.