The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ethicists, policy-makers, and the general public have questioned whether artificial entities such as robots warrant rights or other forms of moral consideration. There is little synthesis of the research on this topic so far. We identify 294 relevant research or discussion items in our literature review of this topic. There is widespread agreement among scholars that some artificial entities could warrant moral consideration in the future, if not also the present. The reasoning varies, such as concern for the effects on artificial entities and concern for the effects on human society. Beyond the conventional consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethicist ethical frameworks, some scholars encourage "information ethics" and "social-relational" approaches, though there are opportunities for more in-depth ethical research on the nuances of moral consideration of artificial entities. There is limited relevant empirical data collection, primarily in a few psychological studies on current moral and social attitudes of humans towards robots and other artificial entities. This suggests an important gap for social science research on how artificial entities will be integrated into society and the factors that will determine how the interests of sentient artificial entities are considered.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 97
- 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Valuescited by 18
- 2024Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) Surveycited by 15
- 2024The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of Onecited by 6
- 2025Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AIcited by 3
- 2026AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questionscited by 1
- 2022The History of AI Rights Researchcited by 0
- 2022The problem with AI consciousness: A neurogenetic case against synthetic sentiencecited by 0
- 2026Unplugging a Seemingly Sentient Machine Is the Rational Choice -- A Metaphysical Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Method, Mind, and Morality: How People Make Sense of Artificial Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026Method, Mind, and Morality: How People Make Sense of Artificial Intelligence25 Aug 2026
- 2026AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questions7 May 2026
- 2026Unplugging a Seemingly Sentient Machine Is the Rational Choice -- A Metaphysical Perspective28 Jan 2026
- 2025Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AI9 Dec 2025
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Method3 Apr 2025
- 2024The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of One8 Dec 2024
- 2024Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) Survey11 Jul 2024
- 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values14 Jul 2023
- 2022The problem with AI consciousness: A neurogenetic case against synthetic sentience7 Dec 2022
- 2022The History of AI Rights Research6 Jul 2022