mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ExPhy: A Benchmark for Explicit Physical Property Learning in Multi-Object Trajectory Forecasting

arXiv 2608.20009 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding object dynamics requires not only predicting future trajectories but also examining whether a model captures the physical properties that govern motion. However, existing benchmarks rarely expose object-level physical properties as explicit evaluation targets alongside trajectory forecasting. To address this gap, we introduce ExPhy, a multi-object trajectory forecasting benchmark containing 24,000 simulated physical scenes with explicit object-level labels for mass, friction, and restitution. ExPhy provides observed and future trajectories together with an in-distribution (ID) split and two out-of-distribution (OOD) splits over physical parameters (OOD-Parameter) and initial states (OOD-Initial) for jointly evaluating trajectory forecasting and physical property estimation. We further instantiate textscPhyODE, a physics-guided model with an explicit property interface that estimates physical properties from observed trajectories and uses them for differentiable future rollout. On the long-horizon OOD-Initial setting, textscPhyODE reduces ADE and FDE by 33.1% and 31.0%, respectively, compared with the strongest baseline. Zero-shot evaluation on ComPhy further assesses cross-benchmark transfer. Property-level analyses reveal that accurate trajectory forecasting does not necessarily imply accurate recovery of the underlying physical properties. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Zest86/ExPhy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
  2. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  3. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understandingcited by 147
  4. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
  5. 2023PAC-NeRF: Physics Augmented Continuum Neural Radiance Fields for Geometry-Agnostic System Identificationcited by 145
  6. 2017Visual Interaction Networkscited by 94
  7. 2022Super-CLEVR: A Virtual Benchmark to Diagnose Domain Robustness in Visual Reasoningcited by 90
  8. 2022Equivariant Graph Mechanics Networks with Constraintscited by 67
  9. 2020Learning Continuous System Dynamics from Irregularly-Sampled Partial Observationscited by 60
  10. 2021Dynamic Visual Reasoning by Learning Differentiable Physics Models from Video and Languagecited by 55
  11. 2020Visual Grounding of Learned Physical Modelscited by 54
  12. 2023Physion++: Evaluating Physical Scene Understanding that Requires Online Inference of Different Physical Propertiescited by 53
13 more
  1. 2022Differentiable Physics Simulation of Dynamics-Augmented Neural Objectscited by 45
  2. 2024Physical Property Understanding from Language-Embedded Feature Fieldscited by 45
  3. 2023SEGNO: Generalizing Equivariant Graph Neural Networks with Physical Inductive Biasescited by 27
  4. 2025Action Quality Assessment via Hierarchical Pose-guided Multi-stage Contrastive Regressioncited by 21
  5. 2025Robust Disentangled Counterfactual Learning for Physical Audiovisual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 20
  6. 20233D-Aware Visual Question Answering about Parts, Poses and Occlusionscited by 16
  7. 2025Explainable Action Form Assessment by Exploiting Multimodal Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoningcited by 13
  8. 2024Compositional Physical Reasoning of Objects and Events from Videoscited by 11
  9. 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suitecited by 9
  10. 2023Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Modelscited by 8
  11. 2025PAINET: A Principled Efficient Transformer for 3D Dynamics Modelingcited by 2
  12. 2026Recover to Predict: Progressive Retrospective Learning for Variable-Length Trajectory Predictioncited by 2
  13. 2024Learning Physical Dynamics for Object-centric Visual Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.