mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

L'evy Attention: Single-Pass Predictive Uncertainty for Continuous-Time Attention

arXiv 2608.19171 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep models for irregularly-sampled time series answer queries at arbitrary continuous timestamps, yet report nothing about how far each answer should be trusted. We show the attention layer itself can close that gap: with the right stochastic formulation, the pass that makes each prediction also reports, in closed form and at no extra cost, how far it should be trusted. We introduce L'evy Attention, a cross-attention operator whose output is a stochastic integral against an inhomogeneous Poisson random measure: query-key compatibilities assemble an intensity over a continuous (time x channel) index space, the measure scatters atoms under it, and the output averages an interpolated value field at those atoms. In expectation it reduces to a mollified cosine-kernel attention, so it replaces a softmax layer and trains with exact gradients. What softmax discards, the Poisson construction preserves in closed form: the evidence Lambdaq (total compatibility mass) and the disagreement tr,SigmaV(q) (value spread). An exact variance identity makes their combination hatσ(q)=√tr,SigmaV(q),varphi(Lambdaq) the root-mean-square deviation of the sampled operator, emitted by the deterministic pass with no trained head. Empirically, disagreement carries the signal, while the evidence factor swings from uninformative on dense data to strongly informative on sparse. On t-PatchGNN the operator swap costs at most 5.6% accuracy against a matched control and nothing on the sparsest dataset. The free disagreement signal improves on 20-pass MC dropout across matched five-seed suites, and hatσ scales a calibrated Gaussian whose zero-sample CRPS beats a fifty-draw sampler; a split-conformal wrapper reaches nominal coverage at every level, and one pass ranks 3,383 unseen patients by trust in 1.4 seconds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.

Builds on

37 of 43 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
  5. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,601
  6. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
  7. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
  8. 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,058
  9. 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 829
  10. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  11. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
  12. 2021CSDI: Conditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputationcited by 582
25 more
  1. 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 554
  2. 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
  3. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 375
  4. 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
  5. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 355
  6. 2021Random Feature Attentioncited by 354
  7. 2018Neural Processescited by 311
  8. 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 283
  9. 2021Multi-Time Attention Networks for Irregularly Sampled Time Seriescited by 238
  10. 2019GRU-ODE-Bayes: Continuous modeling of sporadically-observed time seriescited by 231
  11. 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
  12. 2019Latent ODEs for Irregularly-Sampled Time Seriescited by 183
  13. 2019Set Functions for Time Seriescited by 138
  14. 2018Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flowcited by 135
  15. 2022Transformer Neural Processes: Uncertainty-Aware Meta Learning Via Sequence Modelingcited by 127
  16. 2022On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networkscited by 120
  17. 2021Graph-Guided Network for Irregularly Sampled Multivariate Time Seriescited by 111
  18. 2021Modeling Irregular Time Series with Continuous Recurrent Unitscited by 103
  19. 2021Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEscited by 101
  20. 2024ContiFormer: Continuous-Time Transformer for Irregular Time Series Modelingcited by 63
  21. 2023Warpformer: A Multi-scale Modeling Approach for Irregular Clinical Time Seriescited by 55
  22. 2020Bayesian Attention Modulescited by 51
  23. 2017Learning to Detect Sepsis with a Multitask Gaussian Process RNN Classifiercited by 47
  24. 2020Sparse and Continuous Attention Mechanismscited by 39
  25. 2016A scalable end-to-end Gaussian process adapter for irregularly sampled time series classificationcited by 27

Built on by

Not cited yet.