mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MCP-Guard: A Multi-Stage Defense-in-Depth Framework for Securing Model Context Protocol in Agentic AI

arXiv 2508.10991 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 19

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools via protocols such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP) introduces critical security vulnerabilities, including prompt injection, data exfiltration, and other threats. To counter these challenges, we propose MCP-GUARD, a robust, layered defense architecture designed for LLM-tool interactions. MCP-GUARD employs a three-stage detection pipeline that balances efficiency with accuracy: it progresses from lightweight static scanning for overt threats and a deep neural detector for semantic attacks, to our fine-tuned E5-based model which achieves 96.01% accuracy in identifying adversarial prompts. Finally, an LLM arbitrator synthesizes these signals to deliver the final decision. To enable rigorous training and evaluation, we introduce MCP-ATTACKBENCH, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 70,448 samples augmented by GPT-4. This benchmark simulates diverse real-world attack vectors that circumvent conventional defenses in the MCP paradigm, thereby laying a solid foundation for future research on securing LLM-tool ecosystems.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.

Builds on

10 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems16 Jun
  2. 2025MPMA: Preference Manipulation Attack Against Model Context Protocol16 May
  3. 2025MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI System17 Apr

Other references · 7

  1. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
  2. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 34
  3. 2025MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocolcited by 34
  4. 2025Securing GenAI Multi-Agent Systems Against Tool Squatting: A Zero Trust Registry-Based Approachcited by 18
  5. 2024GenTel-Safe: A Unified Benchmark and Shielding Framework for Defending Against Prompt Injection Attackscited by 7
  6. 2025Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputscited by 6
  7. 2025Simplified and Secure MCP Gateways for Enterprise AI Integrationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 15.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Your Agent May Misevolve: Emergent Risks in Self-evolving LLM Agentscited by 62
  2. 2025MCPSecBench: A Systematic Security Benchmark and Playground for Testing Model Context Protocolscited by 51
  3. 2026TraceSafe: A Systematic Assessment of LLM Guardrails on Multi-Step Tool-Calling Trajectoriescited by 16
  4. 2025MCPGuard : Automatically Detecting Vulnerabilities in MCP Serverscited by 14
  5. 2026ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuationcited by 11
  6. 2026SOK: A Taxonomy of Attack Vectors and Defense Strategies for Agentic Supply Chain Runtimecited by 8
  7. 2025Trusted AI Agents in the Cloudcited by 6
  8. 2026Don't believe everything you read: Understanding and Measuring MCP Behavior under Misleading Tool Descriptionscited by 5
  9. 2026Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?cited by 3
  10. 2026A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanismscited by 3
  11. 2026EVOMAL: Self-Poisoning in Self-Evolving Coding Agentscited by 3
  12. 2026MCP-DPT: A Defense-Placement Taxonomy and Coverage Analysis for Model Context Protocol Securitycited by 2
7 more
  1. 2026CASCADE: A Component Ablation and Corpus Audit of a Layered Local Defense for MCP-Based Systemscited by 1
  2. 2026ChainWatch: A Kill Chain-Aligned Sequential Detection Framework for Multi-Step Attacks in MCP-Based AI Agent Systemscited by 1
  3. 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilitiescited by 0
  4. 2026Labels Are Not Endpoints: Treatment Leakage and Construct Validity in MCP Agent Security Evaluationcited by 0
  5. 2026When Agents Act on Web3: An Attack-Surface Survey of MCP, Skills, and Tool Callingcited by 0
  6. 2026TrustShiftProbe: Characterizing, Benchmarking, and Defending Staged Trust Attacks on MCP Serverscited by 0
  7. 2026On the Effectiveness of Kernel-Level Evidence for Agent Securitycited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MCP Security Bench (MSB): Benchmarking Attacks Against Model Context Protocol in LLM Agents
  2. 2025MCPXKIT: The Unified Toolkit for Analyzing Model Context Protocol Security
  3. 2026Compatibility at a Cost: Systematic Discovery and Exploitation of MCP Clause-Compliance Vulnerabilities
  4. 2026Hybrid Analysis for Secure MCP Tool Use in LLM Agents
  5. 2025MCP-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models with Real-World MCP Servers
  6. 2025Beyond the Protocol: Unveiling Attack Vectors in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) Ecosystem
  7. 2026Breaking the Protocol: Security Analysis of the Model Context Protocol Specification and Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Tool-Integrated LLM Agents
  8. 2024PRP: Propagating Universal Perturbations to Attack Large Language Model Guard-Rails