STAGE: Controlled Objective Admission for Multi-Preference LLM Alignment
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-preference alignment is often framed as scalarization: combine reward dimensions, then optimize. This leaves a temporal decision underspecified: when should each preference dimension enter policy optimization? We propose methodname, a stability-guided active-set controller for controlled objective admission. methodname starts from a small active set, retains admitted objectives, and expands when reward-deviation gates indicate low recent deviation or a patience budget is exhausted. A probing phase estimates a hard-to-easy order, and adaptive weighting emphasizes underperforming active dimensions. Automatic evaluations with 15 training preferences and 16 held-out benchmark columns show that methodname obtains higher averages than simultaneous scalarization and shared-budget adapted baselines. Component ablations and expansion dynamics further support cumulative retention, gated admission, and probing-derived ordering as useful design choices in this setting. These results position objective-entry timing as a concrete control variable in reward-vector RLHF.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment for Language Models11 Aug
- 2025REWARD CONSISTENCY: Improving Multi-Objective Alignment from a Data-Centric Perspective15 Apr
- 2024Curry-DPO: Enhancing Alignment using Curriculum Learning & Ranked Preferences12 Mar
- 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment29 Feb
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment15 Feb
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 261
- 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 244
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 231
5 more
- 2022Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLPcited by 102
- 2025NaturalReasoning: Reasoning in the Wild with 2.8M Challenging Questionscited by 84
- 2025Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in LLMs from an Unveiling Perspective of Safety Decision Boundarycited by 18
- 2017Satirical News Detection and Analysis using Attention Mechanism and Linguistic Featurescited by 14
- 2024Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedbackcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026CompassDPO: Dynamics-Controlled Direct Preference Optimization for Robust Safety Alignment
- 2026Reward Shaping for (Inference-Time) Alignment: A Stackelberg Game Perspective
- 2025Reward-aware Preference Optimization: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Model Alignment
- 2026Direct Hidden-State Alignment: Mapping and Controlling Preference Expression in LLMs
- 2024UNA: A Unified Supervised Framework for Efficient LLM Alignment Across Feedback Types
- 2025Multi-Objective Preference Optimization: Improving Human Alignment of Generative Models
- 2024As Simple as Fine-tuning: LLM Alignment via Bidirectional Negative Feedback Loss
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards