mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Propaganda Forensics: Recovering the Generation Pipeline of an AI-Driven Influence Campaign

arXiv 2608.15746 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a forensic analysis of the generation pipeline behind a recent AI-driven influence campaign. We introduce PROPAGIA, a corpus of 2,646 propagandist French articles from the Storm-1516/CopyCop campaign disclosed by VIGINUM and INSIKT GROUP in 2025. For comparison, we rely on SIPA, a corpus of human-written French mainstream press from the same period. Using topic modeling, vagueness and sentiment analysis, we first isolate persuasion techniques characteristic of propaganda, with PROPAGIA far exceeding SIPA in vagueness, subjectivity and negativity, and citing fewer sources. We then find prompt instruction leaks on 50 of the 84 PROPAGIA websites, including a verbatim ten-point editorial specification accounting for several of these differences, together with high cross-article redundancy. Finally, we show that rewriting-based detection supports INSIKT GROUP's attribution to the Llama 3 family, but also suggests the involvement of Mistral-family models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.

Builds on

25 of 55 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 861
  5. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  7. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  8. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  9. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  10. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  11. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  12. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
13 more
  1. 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 158
  2. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 133
  3. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articlescited by 81
  4. 2018Predicting Factuality of Reporting and Bias of News Media Sourcescited by 71
  5. 2020A Survey on Computational Propaganda Detectioncited by 70
  6. 2022Neural Media Bias Detection Using Distant Supervision With BABE -- Bias Annotations By Expertscited by 56
  7. 2024Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewritingcited by 52
  8. 2023Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websitescited by 38
  9. 2019Findings of the NLP4IF-2019 Shared Task on Fine-Grained Propaganda Detectioncited by 24
  10. 2021Interpretable Propaganda Detection in News Articlescited by 17
  11. 2023Measuring vagueness and subjectivity in texts: from symbolic to neural VAGOcited by 4
  12. 2024Exposing propaganda: an analysis of stylistic cues comparing human annotations and machine classificationcited by 4
  13. 2026Reliable News or Propagandist News? A Neurosymbolic Model Using Genre, Topic, and Persuasion Techniques to Improve Robustness in Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.