Defensive Boosting for Online Probabilistic Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study online probabilistic forecasting of binary outcomes chosen by an adaptive adversary. Given an online learning algorithm for a weak hypothesis class H, we would like to efficiently obtain two incomparable guarantees that existing online boosting techniques provide separately. Online gradient boosting competes in Brier score with the best predictor induced by the span of H on every sequence, but promises nothing when the span does not contain an accurate predictor. Online weak-to-strong boosting drives classification error to zero under a weak-learning condition, but promises little when that condition fails. We give a simple defensive forecasting algorithm, the Defensive Booster, that obtains both guarantees. On every adaptive sequence, its Brier score is competitive with the best prediction induced by the span of H at the same rate as online gradient boosting; simultaneously, whenever the realized transcript satisfies the smooth weak-learning condition, its Brier score and randomized classification error satisfy the same rate guarantee as online classification boosting. This is achieved by operationalizing the "dual view" of boosting: When the algorithm's randomized classification error is persistently high, its mistake weights form a smooth reweighting on which every weak hypothesis has low edge, yielding an ex-post hard-core certificate that the weak-learning condition fails. We also develop a strongly adaptive variant, which satisfies both guarantees on every time interval. The Defensive Booster is very efficient: it accesses just one weak-class learner, whereas the prior online boosting methods we compare against maintain large weak-learner ensembles. Experiments on synthetic and real data streams demonstrate its strong predictive performance (sometimes substantially improving over all prior baselines) coupled with orders-of-magnitude faster runtime.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.
Builds on
25 of 58 references.
References · 25
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2015Strongly Adaptive Online Learningcited by 107
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 95
- 2016Scale-Free Online Learningcited by 85
- 2020Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 75
- 2022Practical Adversarial Multivalid Conformal Predictioncited by 65
- 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 62
- 2020Challenges in Benchmarking Stream Learning Algorithms with Real-world Datacited by 59
- 2021Online Multivalid Learning: Means, Moments, and Prediction Intervalscited by 49
- 2023High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 41
- 2020Stronger Calibration Lower Bounds via Sidesteppingcited by 38
- 2023Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 37
13 more
- 2024Breaking the T2/3 Barrier for Sequential Calibrationcited by 19
- 2023Complexity-Theoretic Implications of Multicalibrationcited by 16
- 2015Online Gradient Boostingcited by 15
- 2015Optimal and Adaptive Algorithms for Online Boostingcited by 12
- 2020Online Agnostic Boosting via Regret Minimizationcited by 12
- 2021Boosting for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 11
- 2025How Global Calibration Strengthens Multiaccuracycited by 8
- 2025Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2026Optimal Lower Bounds for Online Multicalibrationcited by 6
- 2025In Defense of Defensive Forecastingcited by 5
- 2025Efficient Swap Multicalibration of Elicitable Propertiescited by 5
- 2026An Efficient Black-Box Reduction from Online Learning to Multicalibration, and a New Route to Phi-Regret Minimizationcited by 3
- 2017Gradient Boosting on Stochastic Data Streamscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.