Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a distributed learning problem in which learning agents are embedded in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). There is a fixed and arbitrary distribution over feature/label pairs, and each agent or vertex in the graph is able to directly observe only a subset of the features -- potentially a different subset for every agent. The agents learn sequentially in some order consistent with a topological sort of the DAG, committing to a model mapping observations to predictions of the real-valued label. Each agent observes the predictions of their parents in the DAG, and trains their model using both the features of the instance that they directly observe, and the predictions of their parents as additional features. We ask when this process is sufficient to achieve information aggregation, in the sense that some agent in the DAG is able to learn a model whose error is competitive with the best model that could have been learned (in some hypothesis class) with direct access to all features, despite the fact that no single agent in the network has such access. We give upper and lower bounds for this problem for both linear and general hypothesis classes. Our results identify the depth of the DAG as the key parameter: information aggregation can occur over sufficiently long paths in the DAG, assuming that all of the relevant features are well represented along the path, and there are distributions over which information aggregation cannot occur even in the linear case, and even in arbitrarily large DAGs that do not have sufficient depth (such as a hub-and-spokes topology in which the spoke vertices collectively see all the features). We complement our theoretical results with a comprehensive set of experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2025.
Builds on
14 of 33 references.
References · 14
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 62
- 2022Low-Degree Multicalibrationcited by 45
- 2023High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 41
- 2023Multicalibration as Boosting for Regressioncited by 33
- 2025Collaborative Prediction: Tractable Information Aggregation via Agreementcited by 15
- 2022Reconciling Individual Probability Forecastscited by 14
- 2024Tractable Agreement Protocolscited by 13
- 2025How Global Calibration Strengthens Multiaccuracycited by 8
- 2021Agreement Implies Accuracy for Substitutable Signalscited by 5
- 2022False Consensus, Information Theory, and Prediction Marketscited by 4
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Networked Information Aggregation for Binary Classificationcited by 3
- 2026Optimal Deterministic Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 2
- 2026Model Agreement via Anchoringcited by 1
- 2026Optimal Rates for Agentic Networked Information Aggregationcited by 1
- 2026Defensive Boosting for Online Probabilistic Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Lower Bounds for Networked Information Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Narrowing the Collaboration Gap, Probablycited by 0
- 2026Narrowing the Collaboration Gap, Probably13 Oct 2026
- 2026Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregation28 Sep 2026
- 2026Optimal Rates for Agentic Networked Information Aggregation4 Sep 2026
- 2026Optimal Lower Bounds for Networked Information Aggregation16 Aug 2026
- 2026Defensive Boosting for Online Probabilistic Forecasting13 Aug 2026
- 2026Optimal Deterministic Multicalibration and Omniprediction18 Jun 2026
- 2026Networked Information Aggregation for Binary Classification1 May 2026
- 2026Model Agreement via Anchoring26 Feb 2026