Illusion or Integrity? Geometrical Consistency Metric for AIGC Video Quality Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, AI-driven video generation has attracted considerable attention. This surge increases the demand for reliable video quality assessment (VQA) metrics to evaluate AI-generated content (AIGC) videos and guide model optimization. Existing studies assess video quality through visual harmony, video-text consistency, and domain-specific alignment, yet lack quantitative metrics for measuring fidelity to physical laws. To address this limitation, we present a novel benchmark that evaluates the quality of AIGC videos based on their compliance with physical principles by quantitatively measuring geometric consistency across frames extracted from generated sequences. This serves as a proxy for estimating the extent to which generated videos conform to real-world physical rules. Specifically, GeoCon-Bench captures global motion through translation estimation, fits homography or fundamental matrix models using background correspondences, and reports complementary metrics, including inlier ratio and geometric error. We also release a dataset containing 20 scenes across six motion categories. Experiments on state-of-the-art AIGC models demonstrate the reliability of GeoCon-Bench as a video quality assessment metric.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 48 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
- 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
- 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,567
- 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
17 more
- 2024Latte: Latent Diffusion Transformer for Video Generationcited by 546
- 2023VideoPoet: A Large Language Model for Zero-Shot Video Generationcited by 492
- 2024Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Modelscited by 477
- 2024Lumiere: A Space-Time Diffusion Model for Video Generationcited by 455
- 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 340
- 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 327
- 2024MASt3R-SLAM: Real-Time Dense SLAM with 3D Reconstruction Priorscited by 205
- 2017A Survey of Structure from Motioncited by 158
- 2025WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generationcited by 156
- 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 82
- 2023Shadows Don't Lie and Lines Can't Bend! Generative Models don't know Projective Geometry...for nowcited by 61
- 2024VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 45
- 2024AIGCBench: Comprehensive Evaluation of Image-to-Video Content Generated by AIcited by 27
- 2024A Survey of AI-Generated Video Evaluationcited by 17
- 2025Characterizing Photorealism and Artifacts in Diffusion Model-Generated Imagescited by 14
- 2024Exploring AIGC Video Quality: A Focus on Visual Harmony, Video-Text Consistency and Domain Distribution Gapcited by 13
- 2017Fundamental Matrix Estimation: A Study of Error Criteriacited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.