FedTVD: Balancing Data Quality and Quantity for Robust Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed client devices while preserving data privacy. However, FL faces significant challenges due to data heterogeneity, particularly in terms of label distribution skewness and variations in dataset sizes, which can lead to biased model updates and hinder convergence. To address this, we propose FedTVD, a novel FL algorithm that weights client contributions during aggregation by considering both data quality and quantity. Unlike traditional FL approaches such as FedAvg, which rely solely on dataset size for client weighting, FedTVD integrates Total Variation Distance (TVD) to measure the divergence between each client's local label distribution and a uniform global distribution. Clients with highly skewed distributions receive lower weights, preventing unbalanced datasets with imbalances from disproportionately influencing the global model. At the same time, dataset size is incorporated to ensure scalability and fairness. This dual-weighting mechanism effectively mitigates the impact of data imbalance, leading to more stable and generalized global models. Experimental results show that FedTVD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all datasets (FMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) and all levels of data heterogeneity. Notably, it achieves up to 10.6% improvement over FedAvg on CIFAR-10 under highly skewed data, while maintaining top performance even under moderate and IID settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 46 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2021FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalizationcited by 565
10 more
- 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
- 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 409
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
- 2022FedALA: Adaptive Local Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 121
- 2022Federated Learning under Distributed Concept Driftcited by 35
- 2024An Element-Wise Weights Aggregation Method for Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2024Federated Learning Clients Clustering with Adaptation to Data Driftscited by 3
- 2024BN-SCAFFOLD: controlling the drift of Batch Normalization statistics in Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.