Metanormative Theory for RL-Based Moral Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The overlapping disciplines of machine ethics and value alignment are concerned with designing artificial agents that are aligned with human values and that act in ethically acceptable ways. A recent trend in these disciplines is the use of reinforcement learning (RL) to design such agents, sidelining the philosophical literature that used to play a more central role. Against this backdrop, this paper pursues two goals. The first is to draw out ideas from recent work in metanormative theory that can be useful for designing artificial moral and value-aligned agents. The second is to examine the RL architecture through the lens of these ideas. This will give us clearer criteria for when an RL agent's behavior can be classified as moral, as well as a basis for evaluating and comparing different RL-based approaches to machine ethics and value alignment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.
Builds on
2 of 50 references.
References · 2
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 135
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifesto
- 2024Moral Alignment for LLM Agents
- 2023AI Alignment and Social Choice: Fundamental Limitations and Policy Implications
- 2025Toward Virtuous Reinforcement Learning: A Critique and Roadmap
- 2024AI Alignment through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback? Contradictions and Limitations
- 2021MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning
- 2024Dynamic Normativity: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Value Alignment
- 2026MoralityGym: A Benchmark for Evaluating Hierarchical Moral Alignment in Sequential Decision-Making Agents