ComplexityWorld: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Verifiable Visual Decision Making
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) have made rapid progress in visual perception and increasingly support real-world tasks that depend on images. Many such tasks, however, require more than rec- ognizing what an image contains: a model must use visual evidence to make a complete decision whose parts jointly satisfy global constraints. We introduce COMPLEXITYWORLD, a benchmark of 390 tasks across 39 domain-inspired visual worlds and 29 decision categories. Each task is generated from a hidden structured specification, rendered as a visual scene, and scored by an exe- cutable verifier that accepts any feasible solution. Under direct inference, all evaluated models ex- cept GPT-5.6-Sol remain below 40% verifier ac- ceptance rate (VAR), while GPT-5.6-Sol reaches 75.6%. Performance improves substantially when the same decision information is made explicit in structured form, yet varies sharply across equiva- lent visual presentations. Agent scaffolds provide smaller, model-dependent gains. Together, these results reveal a persistent visual-to-decision bot- tleneck that additional inference alone does not remove.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
18 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025PuzzleBench: A Fully Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Multimodal Models on Puzzle Solving15 Apr
- 2025VGRP-Bench: Visual Grid Reasoning Puzzle Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models29 Mar
- 2024Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models13 Jun
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts3 Oct
Other references · 14
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2025MM-IQ: Benchmarking Human-Like Abstraction and Reasoning in Multimodal Modelscited by 28
- 2024FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowchartscited by 27
- 2025iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMscited by 24
- 2025Assessing the Value of Visual Input: A Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language Models for Robotic Path Planningcited by 4
- 2026Pencil Puzzle Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Verifiable Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026WorldTravel: A Realistic Multimodal Travel-Planning Benchmark with Tightly Coupled Constraintscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
- 2026Seeing without Looking: Do Vision-Language Benchmarks Really Test Vision?
- 2025TopoPerception: A Shortcut-Free Evaluation of Global Visual Perception in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Not All Error Yields to Scale: Where Scaling Stops in Vision-Language Inference
- 2025VisChainBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Turn, Multi-Image Visual Reasoning Beyond Language Priors
- 2025VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs
- 2026The Last Visible Pixel: Probing Fine-Scale Perception in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Vero: An Open RL Recipe for General Visual Reasoning