TopoPerception: A Shortcut-Free Evaluation of Global Visual Perception in Large Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) typically align visual features from an encoder with a pre-trained Large Language Model (LLM). However, this makes the visual perception module a bottleneck, which constrains the overall capabilities of LVLMs. Conventional evaluation benchmarks, while rich in visual semantics, often contain unavoidable local shortcuts that can lead to an overestimation of models' perceptual abilities. Here, we introduce TopoPerception, a benchmark that leverages topological properties to rigorously evaluate the global visual perception capabilities of LVLMs across various granularities. Since topology depends on the global structure of an image and is invariant to local features, TopoPerception enables a shortcut-free assessment of global perception, fundamentally distinguishing it from semantically rich tasks. We evaluate state-of-the-art models on TopoPerception and find that even at the coarsest perceptual granularity, all models perform no better than random chance, indicating a profound inability to perceive global visual features. Notably, a consistent trend emerge within model families: more powerful models with stronger reasoning capabilities exhibit lower accuracy. This suggests that merely scaling up models is insufficient to address this deficit and may even exacerbate it. Progress may require new training paradigms or architectures. TopoPerception not only exposes a critical bottleneck in current LVLMs but also offers a lens and direction for improving their global visual perception. The data and code are publicly available at: https://github.com/Wenhao-Zhou/TopoPerception.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.
Builds on
36 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Unveiling Encoder-Free Vision-Language Models17 Jun
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?29 Mar
- 2024Can We Talk Models Into Seeing the World Differently?14 Mar
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning29 Apr
Other references · 31
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
19 more
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
- 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 812
- 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 736
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
- 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 572
- 2023Language Is Not All You Need: Aligning Perception with Language Modelscited by 543
- 2024Janus: Decoupling Visual Encoding for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 457
- 2024A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 82
- 2025A Survey of Token Compression for Efficient Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025Rethinking Visual Token Reduction in LVLMs Under Cross-Modal Misalignmentcited by 11
- 2024Chain-of-Sketch: Enabling Global Visual Reasoningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation
- 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
- 2026ComplexityWorld: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Verifiable Visual Decision Making
- 2026Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: From Evaluation to Diagnosis
- 2026The Last Visible Pixel: Probing Fine-Scale Perception in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Beyond the Vision Encoder: Identifying and Mitigating Spatial Bias in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Seeing without Looking: Do Vision-Language Benchmarks Really Test Vision?