mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finite-Sample Metric Non-Collapse for Geometrically Supervised Latent World Models in Control

arXiv 2608.07265 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026math.OC cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

We establish a finite-sample learning-to-control theory for geometrically supervised latent models of nonlinear deterministic systems. Geometric supervision is used only during training: simulator state, proprioception, or state estimates with independently validated metric and directional error bounds supply observable-state distances and tangent directions, while deployment remains observation- and action-conditioned. We introduce an encoder-only local--global metric hinge that enforces directional resolution and separated-state discrimination. Under regular observable-factor, coverage, finite-capacity approximation, and uniform C1,1 hypotheses, a computable one-sided regularization regime has a strong selection property: with high probability, every approximate empirical minimizer is simultaneously pointwise co-Lipschitz and uniformly approximately semiconjugate to the controlled dynamics. Approximation, sampling, and optimization errors remain explicit and separate. Norm-constrained tensor-product B-spline classes constructively realize the approximation hypotheses, and the interpolation exponent converting mean residual control into a uniform bound is sharp. A modular deterministic corollary transfers the learned certificates to trajectory, finite-horizon cost, learned-cost-head, and optimizer guarantees, while a validated finite-net result enables sharper model-specific certification. Controlled experiments isolate collapse and folding, quantify the analytic certificate's reserve, and demonstrate the control benefit of restored metric resolution. The principal contribution is a complete finite-sample implication from approximate empirical optimization to metric faithfulness, uniform controlled dynamics, and reliable planning for the same learned model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

12 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026ProWorld: Progress-Aware Hyperbolic World Models for Long-Horizon Visual Goal Reaching3 Aug
  2. 2026ActSWM: Action-Sensitive World Models for Long-Horizon Planning in Open-World Games29 Jul
  3. 2026On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models24 Jul
  4. 2026A Control Theory of Predictability in Latent World Models11 Jul
  5. 2026A Generalization Theory for JEPA-Based World Models25 Jun
  6. 2026Certified World Models: Predictability Across Configuration, Horizon, and Resolution11 Jun
  7. 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?25 May
  8. 2026Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Models8 May
  9. 2025Value-guided action planning with JEPA world models28 Dec

Other references · 3

  1. 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
  2. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
  3. 2025Why and How Auxiliary Tasks Improve JEPA Representationscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning and Control Beyond Linearity: Towards a Non-asymptotic Theory for Bilinear Systems
  2. 2026Modeling Latent Disturbances for Robust Decision-Making in World Models
  3. 2026Geometric Pareto Control: Physics-Supervised Pareto Representation Learning via Riemannian Energy-Gradient Flow ↗
  4. 2026Geometric regularization of autoencoders via observed stochastic dynamics
  5. 2026World Model Control by Trajectory Reachability Metrics
  6. 2026Safety-Critical Contextual Control via Online Riemannian Optimization with World Models
  7. 2026Debiased Model-based Representations for Sample-efficient Continuous Control
  8. 2025Learning Dynamics under Environmental Constraints via Measurement-Induced Bundle Structures