Certified World Models: Predictability Across Configuration, Horizon, and Resolution
On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models
Abstract (arXiv)
Scale buys interpolation; structure buys certifiable transfer. A world model's average error does not say whether a particular rollout can be trusted, or for how long. For equivariant latent world models we give a predictability certificate: a computable region spanning configuration, horizon, and resolution. Under exact equivariance, rollout error is invariant over the monoid generated by k primitive symmetries and is certified from the k generators (Theorem A); universal orbit-flatness over equivariant targets characterizes equivariance at the function level (Lemma 2), so an unconstrained architecture cannot certify the property by construction. Approximate orbit-transfer defects propagate by the finite-time Lyapunov spectrum (Theorem B): expanding channels give a logarithmic horizon Tj(ε)~log(1/ε)/λj, neutral channels accumulate recurrent defect linearly, and contracting channels accumulate a bounded nonzero floor. Exact conserved charge values are certified to all horizons only at zero defect; with one-step defect η, charge-value error grows at most as Tη. Empirically, on a 40-dimensional learned model a mathbbZN-equivariant network recovers the full Lyapunov spectrum (R2=0.98-0.99) where dense and recurrent baselines fail. A cone/adapted-metric certificate reads an a-priori horizon off the model's own Jacobian, tight on uniformly hyperbolic dynamics and self-abstaining elsewhere; the resulting horizon improves a budgeted re-observation decision. For public non-equivariant world models the tangent spectrum gives a training-free candidate horizon, paired with a held-out divergence cross-check that abstains or corrects when the learned loop over-promises.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Certified World Models as Sensing Clocks: Drift-Aware Deadlines for Active Perceptioncited by 1
- 2026When Do Conservation Laws Survive Learned Representations? Certified Horizons for Latent World Modelscited by 0
- 2026Finite-Sample Metric Non-Collapse for Geometrically Supervised Latent World Models in Controlcited by 0
- 2026Finite-Sample Metric Non-Collapse for Geometrically Supervised Latent World Models in Control7 Aug 2026
- 2026Certified World Models as Sensing Clocks: Drift-Aware Deadlines for Active Perception1 Jul 2026
- 2026When Do Conservation Laws Survive Learned Representations? Certified Horizons for Latent World Models23 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Conformal Orbit-Valid Trust Horizons for Equivariant World Models
- 2026World-Time Compute with Verified Code World Models
- 2026Rollout-Decoded Reconstruction for Long-Horizon Prediction in Latent World Models
- 2026World Models with Predictable Long-Horizon Marginals
- 2026World Models in Pieces: Structural Certification for General Agents
- 2026An Enclosed Mode Is a Gauge Choice: Topology Relative to Reach in Certified Code World Models
- 2025Four Principles for Physically Interpretable World Models
- 2026Identifiability Without Gaussianity: Symbolic World Models and Near-Infinite Temporal Consistency