mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DASH: Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons for On-Policy Self-Distillation of Reasoning Models

arXiv 2608.06243 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models using automatically verifiable outcome signals, but these signals are typically sparse and at the sequence-level. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) mitigates this sparsity by querying a privileged teacher at student-visited prefixes and providing dense token-level distributional supervision. Although this dense supervision alleviates signal sparsity, we find that standard OPSD still underexploits the temporal structure of the rollout. It assigns every local divergence the same coefficient, regardless of its position or the divergence sequence in which it occurs. In on-policy autoregressive generation, the same divergence magnitude can follow different discrepancy histories, reflecting different evolutions of the mismatch between the teacher and student. Since the local scalar alone cannot distinguish these temporal contexts, standard OPSD cannot adapt its token-level weights to the realized discrepancy sequence. To address this limitation, we propose Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons (DASH). DASH maps the gap between each local distillation signal and the sequence-level mean to an adaptive propagation gate and then uses these gates to control backward multi-step aggregation. By doing so, DASH adjusts token-level supervision weights according to how local divergences evolve during generation. Experiments on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks across three model scales show that DASH improves over our matched vanilla OPSD reruns on every benchmark at all three scales. DASH reuses the teacher and student distributions that OPSD already computes, so the gains require no additional teacher or student forward pass. Code: https://github.com/DBtxy/DASH-OPSD

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

30 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think2 Jul
  2. 2026Your Teacher Can't Help You Here: Combating Supervision Fidelity Decay in On-Policy Distillation29 May

Other references · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  9. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  10. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  11. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  12. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
16 more
  1. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  2. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  3. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  4. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  5. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  6. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  7. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  8. 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 287
  9. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
  10. 2015Unifying distillation and privileged informationcited by 218
  11. 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 202
  12. 2026Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Modelscited by 151
  13. 2020Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordinationcited by 38
  14. 2026When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoningcited by 24
  15. 2026On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillationcited by 23
  16. 2025GRPO-λ: Credit Assignment improves LLM Reasoningcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Teacher-Guided Policy Optimization for On-Policy Reasoning Distillation under Large Policy Divergence
  2. 2026Train Ahead, Distill Back: Bootstrapping On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models
  3. 2026SIPO: Unifying Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Self-Distillation
  4. 2026PAINT: Partial-Solution Adaptive Interpolated Training for Self-Distilled Reasoners
  5. 2026Proxy OPD: On-Policy Distillation with Transferable Relative Proxy Update
  6. 2026Outcome-Guided On-Policy Self-Distillation
  7. 2026RLCSD: Reinforcement Learning with Contrastive On-Policy Self-Distillation
  8. 2026SAPD: Step-Aligned Privileged Distillation