From Non-Convex Self-Concordant Regularization to Scalable Quasi-Newton Training of PINNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often require high-accuracy quasi-Newton refinement to obtain reliable partial differential equation solutions, but their residual objectives can exhibit indefinite, nearly singular, and poorly scaled local curvature. Regularized quasi-Newton methods provide established mechanisms for stabilizing secant models, while self-concordant methods provide local-metric rules for curvature-dependent step selection. Building on these two lines of work, we propose SCORE, a self-concordance-inspired quasi-Newton method with decrement-coupled shifted secant geometry for PINN training. Its distinguishing mechanism is that a single quasi-Newton decrement computed from the learned inverse metric jointly determines a strong-Wolfe-tested candidate step and an adaptive shift used to define the next secant geometry. The shifted displacement represents the action of an averaged shifted metric along the accepted step, while requiring neither Hessian construction nor Hessian-vector products. Under a local spectral-equivalence condition, we show that the quasi-Newton decrement and candidate step remain comparable to their counterparts in a positive shifted metric, and recover the normalized self-concordant rule in the matched-metric case. Strong Wolfe acceptance, fallback line search, and standard curvature safeguards provide globalization without modifying the underlying PINN objective. Experiments on the viscous Burgers, Kuramoto--Sivashinsky, Korteweg--de Vries, and complex Ginzburg--Landau equations show that SCORE attains lower final errors than the tested BFGS and self-scaled Broyden baselines. The Burgers ablation further indicates that shifted curvature stabilization and decrement-based step selection make complementary contributions to high-accuracy refinement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
32 of 61 references.
References · 32
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
- 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 147
- 2018Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
- 2019Learning in Modal Space: Solving Time-Dependent Stochastic PDEs Using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 64
- 2025Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization Perspectivecited by 56
- 2020Solving Inverse Stochastic Problems from Discrete Particle Observations Using the Fokker-Planck Equation and Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 52
- 2025Optimizing the Optimizer for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 42
- 2017Generalized Self-Concordant Functions: A Recipe for Newton-Type Methodscited by 33
- 2024Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?cited by 31
20 more
- 2024Gauss-Newton Natural Gradient Descent for Physics-Informed Computational Fluid Dynamicscited by 28
- 2022Optical Flow Training under Limited Label Budget via Active Learningcited by 14
- 2026Curvature-Aware Optimization for High-Accuracy Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2024Initialization-enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network with Domain Decomposition (IDPINN)cited by 9
- 2026How Early Is Early Enough? Design-Dependent Observation-Window Sufficiency in Subscription Churn Predictioncited by 8
- 2016Quasi-Newton Methods: Superlinear Convergence Without Line Searches for Self-Concordant Functionscited by 7
- 2025Complex Physics-Informed Neural Networkcited by 7
- 2025Dual Natural Gradient Descent for Scalable Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025Convolution-weighting method for the physics-informed neural network: A Primal-Dual Optimization Perspectivecited by 6
- 2026Auditing and Fixing Economic Validity in Tabular Foundation Models for Discrete Choicecited by 6
- 2026Do Time Series Foundation Model Benchmarks Hide Regime-Dependent Failures? Evidence from Traffic Speed Forecastingcited by 5
- 2019Regularization of Limited Memory Quasi-Newton Methods for Large-Scale Nonconvex Minimizationcited by 3
- 2026TINNs: Time-Induced Neural Networks for Solving Time-Dependent PDEscited by 3
- 2026Validation-Stage Combinatorial Fusion Analysis for Imbalanced Credit-Card Fraud Detectioncited by 3
- 2026Embedding Foundation Model Predictions in Discrete-Choice Models with Structural Guaranteescited by 3
- 2026Interpretable vs Learned Encoders for High-Cardinality Fraud Detectioncited by 3
- 2021A Regularized Limited Memory BFGS method for Large-Scale Unconstrained Optimization and its Efficient Implementationscited by 2
- 2026Do physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) need to be deep? Shallow PINNs using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithmcited by 2
- 2025Non-Convex Self-Concordant Functions: Practical Algorithms and Complexity Analysiscited by 1
- 2026Lightweight Geometric Adaptation for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.