mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tailoring: encoding inductive biases by optimizing unsupervised objectives at prediction time

arXiv 2009.10623 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

From CNNs to attention mechanisms, encoding inductive biases into neural networks has been a fruitful source of improvement in machine learning. Adding auxiliary losses to the main objective function is a general way of encoding biases that can help networks learn better representations. However, since auxiliary losses are minimized only on training data, they suffer from the same generalization gap as regular task losses. Moreover, by adding a term to the loss function, the model optimizes a different objective than the one we care about. In this work we address both problems: first, we take inspiration from textittransductive learning and note that after receiving an input but before making a prediction, we can fine-tune our networks on any unsupervised loss. We call this process em tailoring, because we customize the model to each input to ensure our prediction satisfies the inductive bias. Second, we formulate em meta-tailoring, a nested optimization similar to that in meta-learning, and train our models to perform well on the task objective after adapting them using an unsupervised loss. The advantages of tailoring and meta-tailoring are discussed theoretically and demonstrated empirically on a diverse set of examples.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: