Field-Aware Agent Skill Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As lifelong learning agents accumulate lifelong growing skill banks, retrieving the correct skill becomes an increasingly important bottleneck. Most current skill retrieval methods treat each skill as one flat document by concatenating fields such as the name, description, and body. However, skills are naturally structured, multi-field objects, where each field provides different information about when and how the skill should be used. In this work, we study whether preserving this structure improves skill retrieval. We represent each skill as its separate components, and compute sparse and dense similarities for each field independently, exposing a naturally tensorized, field-aware representation of the skill bank. We then combine these field-level scores either with uniform weights or with a small learned MLP. Across two different skill retrieval benchmarks, SkillRet and SRA-Bench, we find that keeping fields separate improves hybrid retrieval, and learning over the field-level scores gives the strongest and most consistent results. Our field-aware MLP reaches 77.95 Recall@10 on SkillRet and 83.78 Recall@10 on SRA-Bench, outperforming the corresponding concatenated learned baselines. We also find that the advantage grows as the skill bank becomes larger, suggesting that field-aware skill retrieval becomes especially useful in the setting where retrieval is most difficult. Our results show that skill representation itself matters, and that simply preserving the structure already present in skill files can substantially improve retrieval.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
7 of 11 references.
References · 7
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2025Retrieval Models Aren't Tool-Savvy: Benchmarking Tool Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 47
- 2026Skill Retrieval Augmentation for Agentic AIcited by 44
- 2026SkillRet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Skill Retrieval in LLM Agentscited by 39
- 2026More Skills, Worse Agents? Skill Shadowing Degrades Performance When Expanding Skill Librariescited by 12
- 2024Multi-Field Adaptive Retrievalcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026What Does a Skill Actually Do? Estimands and Evaluation Validity for Tool and Skill Use in LLM Agents: A Critical Reviewcited by 1
- 2026AnyJev Technical Reportcited by 1
- 2026SkillFM: Generating Skills for LLM Agents via Latent Flow Matchingcited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026AnyJev Technical Report30 Sep 2026
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026SkillFM: Generating Skills for LLM Agents via Latent Flow Matching30 Sep 2026
- 2026What Does a Skill Actually Do? Estimands and Evaluation Validity for Tool and Skill Use in LLM Agents: A Critical Review27 Sep 2026