mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RoMeRL: Balancing Feedback Coverage and the Memory-Reward Trap in Self-Evolving Agent Memory via Reduced-Order Utility States

arXiv 2608.02508 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Learning-based memory systems for self-evolving LLM agents face two tightly coupled challenges. First, trajectory-indexed utilities grow with the interaction history, thereby dispersing limited feedback over an ever-expanding state space. Second, because trajectory-level rewards are jointly assigned to co-retrieved memories, irrelevant experiences may receive misleading utility updates and consequently enter the memory-reward trap. To address these challenges, we introduce Reduced-Order Memory Reinforcement Learning (RoMeRL), which represents the growing trajectory-indexed utility space using a fixed-dimensional per-task memory state factorized by outcome polarity and memory dynamics. RoMeRL incorporates new experiences through a fixed set of semantic coordinates whose contents are updated or replaced over time, thereby concentrating feedback over a bounded utility support. Theoretically, we show that this reduced-order parameterization increases the average feedback received by each utility coordinate and characterize the steady-state occupancy of erroneous coordinates under a generic coordinate-transition model. Empirically, across ALFWorld and LifelongAgentBench, RoMeRL improves task performance, reduces the Cold-Q ratio by 80.0%, increases feedback density by approximately 6.0 times, reduces the maintained memory size by 84.4%, and cuts LLM calls by 21.1%. These results show that reduced-order utility states support efficient self-evolving agent memory while limiting persistent reward contamination. Code is available at: https://github.com/YOUNG-fnxm/RoMeRL

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 32 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

32 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AtomMem: Building Simple and Effective Memory System for LLM Agents via Atomic Facts18 Jun
  2. 2026Fine-Mem: Fine-Grained Feedback Alignment for Long-Horizon Memory Management13 Jan
  3. 2026Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents5 Jan
  4. 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systems21 Dec
  5. 2025ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memory29 Sep
  6. 2025Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement Learning27 Aug
  7. 2025Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs22 Aug
  8. 2025Learn to Memorize: Optimizing LLM-based Agents with Adaptive Memory Framework15 Aug
  9. 2025Memp: Exploring Agent Procedural Memory8 Aug
  10. 2025LifelongAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents as Lifelong Learners17 May
  11. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr
  12. 2025MemInsight: Autonomous Memory Augmentation for LLM Agents27 Mar
3 more
  1. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents17 Feb
  2. 2024HiAgent: Hierarchical Working Memory Management for Solving Long-Horizon Agent Tasks with Large Language Model18 Aug
  3. 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents21 Apr

Other references · 17

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  4. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  5. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  6. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  7. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
  8. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
  9. 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 556
  10. 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
  11. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401
  12. 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 383
5 more
  1. 2026MemRL: Self-Evolving Agents via Runtime Reinforcement Learning on Episodic Memorycited by 129
  2. 2024A Survey on Self-Evolution of Large Language Modelscited by 91
  3. 2024AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model Agentscited by 74
  4. 2026Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineeringcited by 74
  5. 2025FLEX: Continuous Agent Evolution via Forward Learning from Experiencecited by 52

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SEARL: Joint Optimization of Policy and Tool Graph Memory for Self-Evolving Agents
  2. 2026Memory Retention Is Not Enough to Master Memory Tasks in Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents
  4. 2026Live-Evo: Online Evolution of Agentic Memory from Continuous Feedback
  5. 2026Learning How and What to Memorize: Cognition-Inspired Two-Stage Optimization for Evolving Memory
  6. 2026Mem-T: Densifying Rewards for Long-Horizon Memory Agents
  7. 2026Oblivion: Self-Adaptive Agentic Memory Control through Decay-Driven Activation
  8. 2025Memento 2: Learning by Stateful Reflective Memory