mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPARE: Structural Parameter-Free Affinity Regularization for Flow Matching

arXiv 2608.01990 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Denoising diffusion transformers achieve strong generation quality but converge slowly during training. Regularizing their internal representations has emerged as an effective accelerator, yet existing methods split into two families with complementary costs. Target-based methods strengthen representations by aligning them to external features, which requires an external encoder and a learnable projection head to bridge feature spaces. Target-free methods hold no reference at all, and can only repel the model's own features across samples or layers, discarding whatever structure the data contains. Prior work suggests that spatial structure, rather than global semantics, drives the gains of alignment. We therefore ask whether such structure can serve as a target directly, and whether it exists not only within an image but across images. Our key insight is that the clean data latent already carries this structure in the relations among its tokens, where a relation is the similarity between two tokens, a single scalar comparable across feature spaces without a projection head. We propose Structural Parameter-free Affinity Regularization (SPARE), a regularizer that matches the pairwise affinities of intermediate tokens to those of the clean latents. To exploit this structure fully, SPARE extends the matching to token pairs across images, precisely the pairs that prior target-free methods repel by default, and calibrates both relation types with a single learning objective. On ImageNet 256 × 256 with SiT backbones under matched 400K-iteration budgets, SPARE adds no encoder, head, or parameters and only 0.08 GB of training memory, yet attains the lowest FID among parameter-free regularizers in every tested setting, recovers 37 to 54% of REPA's FID reduction, and improves over REPA when combined with it, reaching FID 1.90 under classifier-free guidance at 1M iterations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 21

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  4. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  7. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  8. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  9. 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 889
  10. 2024SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformerscited by 737
  11. 2019Similarity-Preserving Knowledge Distillationcited by 516
  12. 2021Generating Images with Sparse Representationscited by 266
9 more
  1. 2021ReSSL: Relational Self-Supervised Learning with Weak Augmentationcited by 84
  2. 2025What matters for Representation Alignment: Global Information or Spatial Structure?cited by 84
  3. 2025Diffuse and Disperse: Image Generation with Representation Regularizationcited by 70
  4. 2025No Other Representation Component Is Needed: Diffusion Transformers Can Provide Representation Guidance by Themselvescited by 56
  5. 2026SRA 2: Variational Autoencoder Self-Representation Alignment for Efficient Diffusion Trainingcited by 9
  6. 2025No Alignment Needed for Generation: Learning Linearly Separable Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 8
  7. 2026DiverseDiT: Towards Diverse Representation Learning in Diffusion Transformerscited by 5
  8. 2026AHPA: Adaptive Hierarchical Prior Alignment for Diffusion Transformerscited by 4
  9. 2026Beyond Point-Wise Matching: Structural Representation Alignment for Accelerating Diffusion Transformerscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026JLT: Clean-Latent Prediction in Latent Diffusion Transformers
  2. 2026Learning When to Denoise: Optimizing Asynchronous Schedules for Latent Diffusion
  3. 2024Edge-preserving noise for diffusion models
  4. 2026Temporal Pair Consistency for Variance-Reduced Flow Matching
  5. 2026RiT: Vanilla Diffusion Transformers Suffice in Representation Space
  6. 2025Flow Matching in the Low-Noise Regime: Pathologies and a Contrastive Remedy
  7. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling
  8. 2026Spatially-Grounded Flow Matching: Structured Source Distributions for Image Generation