AdvPlan-Bench: Adversarial Evaluation of Structured Plan-Generation Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Structured plan-generation agents are often evaluated as if a plan has quality in isolation, yet many realistic planning tasks require asking how a candidate behaves when another agent can search for responses. We introduce AdvPlan-Bench, an offline benchmark for adversarial evaluation of structured plan-generation agents. The contribution is a general evaluation object: a typed plan, an adversarial response set, selector diagnostics, and traceable candidate-frontier metrics. AdvPlan-Bench represents plans as typed action chains with optional branches, assigns synthetic quality scores, compares opposing plans with BLUE-vs-RED advantage and Nash-gap diagnostics, and evaluates qualitative constraint coherence with a transparent heuristic rubric. In 150 synthetic scenarios spanning five planning templates, a sampled best-response policy that draws eight response candidates reduces BLUE advantage from .518 to .486 and BLUE win rate from .900 to .820 relative to a single-sample response. An offline LLM-policy contract baseline reaches .496 BLUE advantage and .700 BLUE win rate, while a two-stage multi-agent council obtains .509 BLUE advantage and .813 BLUE win rate. A three-rater rubric-sensitivity study over 600 rating records yields .978 inter-rater agreement. AdvPlan-Bench is not an operational planner and provides no evidence about real-world decision quality; it is a reproducible benchmark artifact for studying adversarial plan evaluation, response-budget sensitivity, candidate frontiers, and multi-agent critique-and-revision traces.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.
Builds on
10 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 9
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
- 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
- 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 170
- 2025SPIRAL: Symbolic LLM Planning via Grounded and Reflective Searchcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026textttYC-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Long-Term Planning and Consistent Execution
- 2026Agent Planning Benchmark: A Diagnostic Framework for Planning Capabilities in LLM Agents
- 2026Adversarial Course-of-Action Generation: Game-Theoretic Multi-Agent Algorithms for COA matching & COA generation
- 2026GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation
- 2026DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints
- 2026Context, Reasoning, and Hierarchy: A Cost-Performance Study of Compound LLM Agent Design in an Adversarial POMDP
- 2026What Makes a Good Terminal-Agent Benchmark Task: A Guideline for Adversarial, Difficult, and Legible Evaluation Design