mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPIRAL: Symbolic LLM Planning via Grounded and Reflective Search

arXiv 2512.23167 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) often falter at complex planning tasks that require exploration and self-correction, as their linear reasoning process struggles to recover from early mistakes. While search algorithms like Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) can explore alternatives, they are often ineffective when guided by sparse rewards and fail to leverage the rich semantic capabilities of LLMs. We introduce SPIRAL (Symbolic LLM Planning via Grounded and Reflective Search), a novel framework that embeds a cognitive architecture of three specialized LLM agents into an MCTS loop. SPIRAL's key contribution is its integrated planning pipeline where a Planner proposes creative next steps, a Simulator grounds the search by predicting realistic outcomes, and a Critic provides dense reward signals through reflection. This synergy transforms MCTS from a brute-force search into a guided, self-correcting reasoning process. On the DailyLifeAPIs and HuggingFace datasets, SPIRAL consistently outperforms the default Chain-of-Thought planning method and other state-of-the-art agents. More importantly, it substantially surpasses other state-of-the-art agents; for example, SPIRAL achieves 83.6% overall accuracy on DailyLifeAPIs, an improvement of over 16 percentage points against the next-best search framework, while also demonstrating superior token efficiency. Our work demonstrates that structuring LLM reasoning as a guided, reflective, and grounded search process yields more robust and efficient autonomous planners. The source code, full appendices, and all experimental data are available for reproducibility at the official project repository.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks2 Feb
  2. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models6 Oct
  3. 2023Reason for Future, Act for Now: A Principled Framework for Autonomous LLM Agents with Provable Sample Efficiency29 Sep
  4. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation25 May
  5. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model24 May

Other references · 20

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  5. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  6. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
  7. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,745
  8. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
  9. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  10. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
  11. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
  12. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
8 more
  1. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 591
  2. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
  3. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 344
  4. 2023TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automationcited by 144
  5. 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 67
  6. 2024Formal-LLM: Integrating Formal Language and Natural Language for Controllable LLM-based Agentscited by 40
  7. 2025ELABORATION: A Comprehensive Benchmark on Human-LLM Competitive Programmingcited by 16
  8. 2025CodeGrad: Integrating Multi-Step Verification with Gradient-Based LLM Refinementcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey
  2. 2026Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning
  3. 2026Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework
  4. 2023Improving Planning with Large Language Models: A Modular Agentic Architecture
  5. 2024Chasing Progress, Not Perfection: Revisiting Strategies for End-to-End LLM Plan Generation
  6. 2024Query-Efficient Planning with Language Models
  7. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)
  8. 2025LLMs Can Plan Only If We Tell Them