HARGO: Heterogeneity-Aware Reward-Guided Optimization for RL Post-Training of LLMs on HPC Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can equip large language models (LLMs) with domain knowledge for high-performance computing (HPC) tasks such as data race detection and benchmark question answering. However, knowledge alone does not guarantee task-appropriate behavior: the same SFT model that correctly classifies 88.65% of C/C++ data race samples produces verbose, imprecise answers to factual queries, with 65.9% of MLPerf responses exceeding 40 characters. Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training addresses this gap by optimizing for task-specific rewards rather than token-level imitation. Yet HPC tasks exhibit extreme heterogeneity, with binary classification, factual QA, and semantic generation differing by 58x in answer length, spanning three distinct reward distributions, and showing widely varying SFT accuracy. This makes uniform-weight RL methods such as GRPO suboptimal. We propose HARGO, Heterogeneity-Aware Reward-Guided Optimization, which introduces per-response importance weighting via confidence-modulated advantage: computing a discrimination signal from group-level reward contrast and a confidence signal from reference model log-probabilities, then modulating the advantage before computing per-response weights, without requiring task-type labels. Across four HPC tasks and nine methods, HARGO achieves the best performance on all three primary metrics: WinRate 54.62%, Data Race F1 91.30%, and PLP Similarity 0.8558. Ablation confirms complementary contributions from both signals. HARGO establishes the best overall alignment quality among compared methods for heterogeneous HPC tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2024The Landscape and Challenges of HPC Research and LLMscited by 22
- 2024Performance-Aligned LLMs for Generating Fast Codecited by 20
- 2024OMPGPT: A Generative Pre-trained Transformer Model for OpenMPcited by 16
- 2023Scope is all you need: Transforming LLMs for HPC Codecited by 12
- 2023MonoCoder: Domain-Specific Code Language Model for HPC Codes and Taskscited by 12
5 more
- 2024HPC-Coder-V2: Studying Code LLMs Across Low-Resource Parallel Languagescited by 8
- 2025LLM & HPC:Benchmarking DeepSeek's Performance in High-Performance Computing Taskscited by 8
- 2024OMPar: Automatic Parallelization with AI-Driven Source-to-Source Compilationcited by 5
- 2024LLM as HPC Expert: Extending RAG Architecture for HPC Datacited by 5
- 2026Exploring the Role of LLMs in HPC Programming: A Surveycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Confidence-Aware Reward Modeling for Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions
- 2026TIPS: Turn-Level Information-Potential Reward Shaping for Search-Augmented LLMs
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
- 2025Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connections
- 2026Exploration-Driven Optimization for Test-Time Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification
- 2026On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-training