mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Generative Information Extraction with Two-step Validation: A Product Attribute Use Case

arXiv 2607.26780 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability of large language models (LLMs) to process and generate text has introduced potential for applications in information extraction (IE). While it's debated whether LLMs outperform smaller fine-tuned models for classification tasks, their strong generalization capability makes them promising for domains with limited labeled data available for fine-tuning. This advantage is particularly relevant for the emerging application of the digital product passport (DPP), where the problem space is broad but domain-specific data remains scarce. Motivated by this use case, we apply generative IE to the product domain, explicitly addressing efficiency, generalizability, and data privacy constraints. We propose a two-step validation method that integrates a PLM block into the generative IE pipeline and thereby leverages LLMs' correction capability. We discover that such a validation task enhances LLM performance, particularly on the extraction of weakly expressed, low-salience entities that appear sparsely throughout the text. For certain entities, the performance of mid-size models can even reach levels comparable to larger models, and the improvement of first-step PLM predictions also enhance the final LLM output. Nevertheless, the effects on the smallest open-source LLMs (e.g., Llama-3.2 3B) is limited. Based on the findings, we develop a demo application for product information extraction that utilizes locally deployed LLMs, targeting further adaptations to real-world DPP use cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 38 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  5. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  6. 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
  7. 2023ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPTcited by 250
  8. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 230
  9. 2022Unified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extractioncited by 220
  10. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  11. 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 158
  12. 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulnesscited by 130
9 more
  1. 2023Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples!cited by 119
  2. 2023GoLLIE: Annotation Guidelines improve Zero-Shot Information-Extractioncited by 116
  3. 2020Cross-lingual Information Retrieval with BERTcited by 27
  4. 2024Using LLMs for the Extraction and Normalization of Product Attribute Valuescited by 20
  5. 2024A Simple but Effective Approach to Improve Structured Language Model Output for Information Extractioncited by 16
  6. 2024MetaIE: Distilling a Meta Model from LLM for All Kinds of Information Extraction Taskscited by 14
  7. 2024LinkNER: Linking Local Named Entity Recognition Models to Large Language Models using Uncertaintycited by 12
  8. 2020A Corpus Study and Annotation Schema for Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction of Business Productscited by 5
  9. 2025MPL: Multiple Programming Languages with Large Language Models for Information Extractioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.