MPL: Multiple Programming Languages with Large Language Models for Information Extraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research in information extraction (IE) focuses on utilizing code-style inputs to enhance structured output generation. The intuition behind this is that the programming languages (PLs) inherently exhibit greater structural organization than natural languages (NLs). This structural advantage makes PLs particularly suited for IE tasks. Nevertheless, existing research primarily focuses on Python for code-style simulation, overlooking the potential of other widely-used PLs (e.g., C++ and Java) during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) phase. In this research, we propose Multiple Programming Languages with large language models for information extraction (abbreviated as MPL), a novel framework that explores the potential of incorporating different PLs in the SFT phase. Additionally, we introduce textttfunction-prompt with virtual running to simulate code-style inputs more effectively and efficiently. Experimental results on a wide range of datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of MPL. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to provide a comprehensive analysis. We have released our code for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.
Builds on
31 of 58 references.
References · 31
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 799
- 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 559
19 more
- 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 502
- 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 250
- 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 185
- 2021Document-Level Event Argument Extraction by Conditional Generationcited by 155
- 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulnesscited by 130
- 2021Text2Event: Controllable Sequence-to-Structure Generation for End-to-end Event Extractioncited by 129
- 2023Zhongjing: Enhancing the Chinese Medical Capabilities of Large Language Model through Expert Feedback and Real-world Multi-turn Dialoguecited by 119
- 2023GoLLIE: Annotation Guidelines improve Zero-Shot Information-Extractioncited by 119
- 2019Multi-Sentence Argument Linkingcited by 81
- 2022Code4Struct: Code Generation for Few-Shot Event Structure Predictioncited by 70
- 2023CodeIE: Large Code Generation Models are Better Few-Shot Information Extractorscited by 68
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation for Universal Information Extractioncited by 40
- 2024KnowCoder: Coding Structured Knowledge into LLMs for Universal Information Extractioncited by 34
- 2021Query and Extract: Refining Event Extraction as Type-oriented Binary Decodingcited by 26
- 2022Reviewing Labels: Label Graph Network with Top-k Prediction Set for Relation Extractioncited by 10
- 2022Sequence Generation with Label Augmentation for Relation Extractioncited by 9
- 2023PromptRE: Weakly-Supervised Document-Level Relation Extraction via Prompting-Based Data Programmingcited by 4
- 2021On the Importance and Shortcomings of Code Readability Metrics: A Case Study on Reactive Programmingcited by 2
- 2023Labels Need Prompts Too: Mask Matching for Natural Language Understanding Taskscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.