mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LinkNER: Linking Local Named Entity Recognition Models to Large Language Models using Uncertainty

arXiv 2402.10573 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Named Entity Recognition (NER) serves as a fundamental task in natural language understanding, bearing direct implications for web content analysis, search engines, and information retrieval systems. Fine-tuned NER models exhibit satisfactory performance on standard NER benchmarks. However, due to limited fine-tuning data and lack of knowledge, it performs poorly on unseen entity recognition. As a result, the usability and reliability of NER models in web-related applications are compromised. Instead, Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 possess extensive external knowledge, but research indicates that they lack specialty for NER tasks. Furthermore, non-public and large-scale weights make tuning LLMs difficult. To address these challenges, we propose a framework that combines small fine-tuned models with LLMs (LinkNER) and an uncertainty-based linking strategy called RDC that enables fine-tuned models to complement black-box LLMs, achieving better performance. We experiment with both standard NER test sets and noisy social media datasets. LinkNER enhances NER task performance, notably surpassing SOTA models in robustness tests. We also quantitatively analyze the influence of key components like uncertainty estimation methods, LLMs, and in-context learning on diverse NER tasks, offering specific web-related recommendations. Code is available at https://github.com/zhzhengit/LinkNER.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.

Builds on

18 of 40 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  7. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
  8. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  9. 2021Unified Named Entity Recognition as Word-Word Relation Classificationcited by 89
  10. 2018Chinese NER Using Lattice LSTMcited by 81
  11. 2020An Analysis of Simple Data Augmentation for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 75
  12. 2021SpanNER: Named Entity Re-/Recognition as Span Predictioncited by 55
6 more
  1. 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applicationscited by 44
  2. 2023Small Models are Valuable Plug-ins for Large Language Modelscited by 42
  3. 2020Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Studycited by 35
  4. 2021A Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 26
  5. 2022MINER: Improving Out-of-Vocabulary Named Entity Recognition from an Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 17
  6. 2020Interpretability Analysis for Named Entity Recognition to Understand System Predictions and How They Can Improvecited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

12 papers.