mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Distinctive Co-occurrence Characteristics of Antonymy

arXiv 2509.11534 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Antonymy has long received particular attention in lexical semantics. Previous studies have shown that antonym pairs frequently co-occur in text, across genres and parts of speech, more often than would be expected by chance. However, whether this co-occurrence pattern is distinctive of antonymy remains unclear, due to a lack of comparison with other semantic relations. This work fills the gap by comparing antonymy with three other relations across parts of speech using robust co-occurrence metrics. We find that antonymy is distinctive in three respects: antonym pairs co-occur with high strength, in a preferred linear order, and within short spans. All results are available online.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016HyperLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Graded Lexical Entailmentcited by 26
  2. 2018Hearst Patterns Revisited: Automatic Hypernym Detection from Large Text Corporacited by 26
  3. 2024Misalignment of Semantic Relation Knowledge between WordNet and Human Intuitioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.