ARCHER: Agentic Rule and Compliance Harness for Executable Regulations
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Verifying building compliance requires validating thousands of rules against large Building Information Modeling (BIM) designs, which is laborious, capital-intensive, and unscalable. Existing Automated Compliance Checkers (ACCs) are often difficult to generalize across different scenarios, as they are typically developed for highly specific rule sets and use cases. In addition, many ACCs are proprietary, meaning the underlying verification code is not released to end users, so users cannot verify whether their regulatory intent can be accurately captured. We introduce ARCHER (Agentic Rule and Compliance Harness for Executable Regulations), a test-driven, deterministically orchestrated multi-agent program-synthesis harness that generates auditable verification code from regulatory Codes of Practice, enabling transparent, adaptable, and scalable compliance checking. To characterize what makes agentic synthesis work, we evaluate a taxonomy of six harnesses of increasing agentic sophistication across four backbone models, spanning realistic data-governance tiers (from frontier third-party APIs to a fully on-premise open-weights model) on a novel dataset derived from real-world compliance scenarios. ARCHER's deterministic multi-agent orchestration achieves the highest accuracy for every backbone, improving mean union accuracy by 82% over a naive single-pass prompting baseline. Our cost-accuracy analysis further shows that using the ARCHER harness, a self-hosted open-weights model can reach 97.8% of frontier-API accuracy at a quarter of the cost, making data-sovereign compliance checking practical.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.
Builds on
13 of 32 references.
References · 13
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
- 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
- 2025Large Language Model-Driven Code Compliance Checking in Building Information Modelingcited by 10
- 2024CODE-ACCORD: A Corpus of building regulatory data for rule generation towards automatic compliance checkingcited by 6
- 2024Using Large Language Models for the Interpretation of Building Regulationscited by 6
- 2025Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration Achieves Deterministic, High-Quality Decision Support for Incident Responsecited by 6
- 2026Test-Driven AI Agent Definition (TDAD): Compiling Tool-Using Agents from Behavioral Specificationscited by 6
- 2026Scaling Test-Driven Code Generation from Functions to Classes: An Empirical Studycited by 4
- 2019Towards French Smart Building Code: Compliance Checking Based on Semantic Rulescited by 2
- 2025Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Studycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ARPaCCino: An Agentic-RAG for Policy as Code Compliance
- 2026AgentLTL: A Trace-Verification Framework for Measuring, Enforcing, and Training Procedural Compliance in Tool-Using LLM Agents
- 2026MANTRA: Synthesizing SMT-Validated Compliance Benchmarks for Tool-Using LLM Agents
- 2026Governed AI-Assisted Engineering: Graduated Human Oversight for Agentic Code Generation in Regulated Domains
- 2026Probabilistic Agents in Deterministic Audits: Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems for Automated Audits Based on the German IT-Grundschutz
- 2026An Agentic RAG and Evaluation Framework for Assurance Case Generation: Industrial Use Case for the EU Cyber Resilience Act Compliance
- 2026Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code
- 2026VulnAgent-R2: Evidence-Calibrated Multi-Agent Auditing for Repository-Level Vulnerability Detection