mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study

arXiv 2510.02634 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building officials, particularly those in resource-constrained or rural jurisdictions, face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity. The growing adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Large Language Models (LLMs) presents opportunities for automated code review (ACR) solutions. This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification using both retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and Model Context Protocol (MCP) agent pipelines. The framework employs LLM-enabled agents to extract geometry, schedules, and system attributes from heterogeneous file types, which are then processed for building code checking through two complementary mechanisms: (1) direct API calls to the US Department of Energy COMcheck engine, providing deterministic and audit-ready outputs, and (2) RAG-based reasoning over rule provisions, enabling flexible interpretation where coverage is incomplete or ambiguous. The framework was evaluated through case demonstrations, including automated extraction of geometric attributes (such as surface area, tilt, and insulation values), parsing of operational schedules, and validation of lighting allowances under ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2022. Comparative performance tests across multiple LLMs showed that GPT-4o achieved the best balance of efficiency and stability, while smaller models exhibited inconsistencies or failures. Results confirm that MCP agent pipelines outperform RAG reasoning pipelines in rigor and reliability. This work advances ACR research by demonstrating a scalable, interoperable, and production-ready approach that bridges BIM with authoritative code review tools.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 24 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2025Large Language Model-Driven Code Compliance Checking in Building Information Modelingcited by 10
  5. 2024Exploring Gen-AI applications in building research and industry: A reviewcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Text2BIM: Generating Building Models Using a Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Framework
  2. 2025BIMgent: Towards Autonomous Building Modeling via Computer-use Agents
  3. 2026Automating Geometry-Intensive Compliance Checking in BIM: Graph-Based Semantic Reasoning Framework
  4. 2024Using Large Language Models for the Interpretation of Building Regulations
  5. 2022Building Information Modeling Using Constraint Logic Programming ↗
  6. 2025MCP4IFC: IFC-Based Building Design Using Large Language Models
  7. 2026Automating structural reliability analysis with a multi-agent large language model framework
  8. 2026Reducing Hallucinations in Large Language Models Through Integrated Self-Verification and Retrieval-Augmented Generation