AgentLTL: A Trace-Verification Framework for Measuring, Enforcing, and Training Procedural Compliance in Tool-Using LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling
Abstract (arXiv)
Tool-using LLM agents are usually evaluated by final-answer correctness or LLM judges. Neither captures how an answer was produced. In safety-critical settings, the procedure itself is part of correctness. In this paper, we introduce AgentLTL, a language derived from First-Order Linear Temporal Logic (FO-LTL) that expresses procedural rules over agent traces. It yields a deterministic, judge-free compliance score. In this framework, a single specification drives two usages. The first is harnessing: the constraints score completed traces, or gate tool calls by checking each prefix online, before execution. The second is finetuning: the score serves as a dense reward. On a benchmark spanning ordering, branching, iteration, and grounding, block-and-warn harnessing improves compliance on five of seven models. Finetuning with the same reward yields +38 and +17.5 percentage point gains in accuracy and compliance on held-out patterns, including unseen tool-name aliases. These findings are consistent with the model acquiring procedural structure rather than memorizing surface tool names and procedures.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs24 May
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools9 Feb
Other references · 14
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
- 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agentscited by 385
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 319
- 2023FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarioscited by 247
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 196
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 145
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agentscited by 67
- 2026Solver-Aided Verification of Policy Compliance in Tool-Augmented LLM Agentscited by 15
- 2026The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agentscited by 11
- 2026AEGIS: No Tool Call Left Unchecked -- A Pre-Execution Firewall and Audit Layer for AI Agentscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026COVENANT: Natural-Language Workflow Compilation for Aligned Agent Executioncited by 1
- 2026From Passive Delegates to Strategic Negotiators: Reinforcing Social Reasoning in Small Language Models with SocialRLcited by 0
- 2026STAGE: Stateful Translation to Agentic Graph Execution with Policy-Scoped Context and Deterministic Controlcited by 0
- 2026How Strongly Should Task State Influence an LLM Agent?cited by 0
- 2026How Strongly Should Task State Influence an LLM Agent?22 Sep 2026
- 2026STAGE: Stateful Translation to Agentic Graph Execution with Policy-Scoped Context and Deterministic Control23 Aug 2026
- 2026From Passive Delegates to Strategic Negotiators: Reinforcing Social Reasoning in Small Language Models with SocialRL13 Aug 2026
- 2026COVENANT: Natural-Language Workflow Compilation for Aligned Agent Execution28 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MANTRA: Synthesizing SMT-Validated Compliance Benchmarks for Tool-Using LLM Agents
- 2026Evaluating Implicit Regulatory Compliance in LLM Tool Invocation via Logic-Guided Synthesis
- 2026Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures
- 2026AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling
- 2026Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety
- 2026AgentEscapeBench: Evaluating Out-of-Domain Tool-Grounded Reasoning in LLM Agents
- 2026ContractEval: Query-Conditioned Execution Matching for Procedural Instruction Conformance
- 2026AgentBoundary: Counterfactual Evaluation of Safety in Tool-Using LLM Agents