mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Autoencoders Encode Both Concepts and Functions: The Downstream Geometry of Feature Effects

arXiv 2607.24645 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

The wide-scale use of sparse autoencoders (SAEs) as interpretability tools is limited by inconsistent links between SAE features and model behavior. Features with clear activation descriptions may have weak or unexpected causal effects; steering can vary across prompts or oppose the intended direction; and activation-based feature selection can miss features that produce the desired output change. Prior work has studied feature geometry inside the model, where features are computed. We instead study the geometry of changes in model logits caused by feature interventions. We introduce Feature-Effect Geometry Analysis (FEGA), an unsupervised framework that removes the same active SAE feature across contexts and analyzes the resulting cloud of logit changes. Across SAE variants, consistent one-dimensional effects are rare: few features behave like reusable directions. To interpret this variation, we distinguish value-like features, tied to static information such as factual attributes, from pointer-like features, associated with context-dependent operations. Value-like features more often exhibit structured, low-dimensional effects, although these effects typically span several directions. Pointer-like features, by contrast, predominantly exhibit diffuse effects. Our results show that a feature can be interpretable and causally relevant without providing a stable direction for steering.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr
  2. 2026Finding Belief Geometries with Sparse Autoencoders3 Apr
  3. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?15 Feb
  4. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders21 Mar
  5. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometry3 Mar
  6. 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structure10 Oct
  7. 2024Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Small5 Sep
  8. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 29 Aug

Other references · 17

  1. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  3. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  4. 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 337
  5. 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
  6. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  7. 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 143
  8. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  9. 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 79
  10. 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Featurescited by 78
  11. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Modelscited by 76
  12. 2025Understanding (Un)Reliability of Steering Vectors in Language Modelscited by 47
5 more
  1. 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Wordscited by 18
  2. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedycited by 14
  3. 2025Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Concept Representations in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 12
  4. 2025Illusion or Algorithm? Investigating Memorization, Emergence, and Symbolic Processing in In-Context Learningcited by 3
  5. 2026The Rate-Distortion-Polysemanticity Tradeoff in SAEscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Pre-Intervention Prediction of Sparse Autoencoder Steering Side Effects
  2. 2025Measuring Sparse Autoencoder Feature Sensitivity
  3. 2026What Do Sparse Autoencoder Feature Discovery Scores Identify? From Activations to Interventions
  4. 2026Are Single-Token Sparse Autoencoder Features Causally Necessary? Layer-Depth and SAE-Family Effects
  5. 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
  6. 2026Beyond Activation Patterns: A Weight-Based Out-of-Context Explanation of Sparse Autoencoder Features
  7. 2026From Input to Output: A Flexible Agent for Dual-End Interpretation of Sparse Autoencoder Features
  8. 2025Understanding sparse autoencoder scaling in the presence of feature manifolds