Finding Belief Geometries with Sparse Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the geometric structure of internal representations is a central goal of mechanistic interpretability. Prior work has shown that transformers trained on sequences generated by hidden Markov models encode probabilistic belief states as simplex-shaped geometries in their residual stream, with vertices corresponding to latent generative states. Whether large language models trained on naturalistic text develop analogous geometric representations remains an open question. We introduce a pipeline for discovering candidate simplex-structured subspaces in transformer representations, combining sparse autoencoders (SAEs), k-subspace clustering of SAE features, and simplex fitting using AANet. We validate the pipeline on a transformer trained on a multipartite hidden Markov model with known belief-state geometry. Applied to Gemma-2-9B, we identify 13 priority clusters exhibiting candidate simplex geometry (K ≥ 3). A key challenge is distinguishing genuine belief-state encoding from tiling artifacts: latents can span a simplex-shaped subspace without the mixture coordinates carrying predictive signal beyond any individual feature. We therefore adopt barycentric prediction as our primary discriminating test. Among the 13 priority clusters, 3 exhibit a highly significant advantage on near-vertex samples (Wilcoxon p < 10-14) and 4 on simplex-interior samples. Together 5 distinct real clusters pass at least one split, while no null cluster passes either. One cluster, 768596, additionally achieves the highest causal steering score in the dataset. This is the only case where passive prediction and active intervention converge. We present these findings as preliminary evidence that genuine belief-like geometry exists in Gemma-2-9B's representation space, and identify the structured evaluation that would be required to confirm this interpretation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 714
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
- 2025Language Models Use Trigonometry to Do Additioncited by 68
- 2026When Models Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Counting Taskcited by 43
- 2025Constrained belief updates explain geometric structures in transformer representationscited by 14
- 2019Finding Archetypal Spaces Using Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025Neural networks leverage nominally quantum and post-quantum representationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.