Beyond Activation Patterns: A Weight-Based Out-of-Context Explanation of Sparse Autoencoder Features
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful technique for decomposing language model representations into interpretable features. Current interpretation methods infer feature semantics from activation patterns, but overlook that features are trained to reconstruct activations that serve computational roles in the forward pass. We introduce a novel weight-based interpretation framework that measures functional effects through direct weight interactions, requiring no activation data. Through three experiments on Gemma-2 and Llama-3.1 models, we demonstrate that (1) 1/4 of features directly predict output tokens, (2) features actively participate in attention mechanisms with depth-dependent structure, and (3) semantic and non-semantic feature populations exhibit distinct distribution profiles in attention circuits. Our analysis provides the missing out-of-context half of SAE feature interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability17 Feb
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders28 Jan
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoders27 Oct
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders22 Sep
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
- 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 41
- 2024Decoding Dark Matter: Specialized Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Rare Concepts in Foundation Modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026From Input to Output: A Flexible Agent for Dual-End Interpretation of Sparse Autoencoder Features
- 2025Scaling sparse feature circuit finding for in-context learning
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models
- 2026When the Coffee Feature Activates on Coffins: An Analysis of Feature Extraction and Steering for Mechanistic Interpretability
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
- 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation