Decentralized Granular Access Control for Agentic AI Systems in Critical Infrastructure
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The deployment of autonomous AI agents in production infrastructure introduces fundamental security challenges that traditional role-based access control (RBAC) models cannot address. Unlike deterministic automation, AI agents exhibit stochastic behavior, making conventional trust models insufficient for governing their access to critical systems. This paper presents a decentralized, multi-layered access control architecture designed specifically for agentic AI systems operating in critical cloud infrastructure. Our framework introduces four key innovations: (1) a compound identity model that binds agent actions to delegated human authority, (2) a hierarchical permission system spanning five granularity levels from global platform access to per-parameter constraints, (3) a decentralized policy ownership model where tool teams independently govern their authorization boundaries, and (4) progressive trust escalation with safety interlocks that prevent autonomous agents from executing high-risk operations. We ground our design in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) threat taxonomy and demonstrate how each architectural decision mitigates specific attack vectors. Deployed in production at a major cloud provider managing network infrastructure across hundreds of datacenters, the system enforces granular access control for 20+ specialized AI agents and 60+ deterministic playbooks processing thousands of operations daily while maintaining zero unauthorized write operations over eight months of production deployment. We present empirical data on access pattern distributions, denial rates, and the effectiveness of layered authorization in preventing privilege escalation by non-deterministic actors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Autonomous Incident Resolution at Hyperscale: An Agentic AI Architecture for Network Operations8 Jun
Other references · 7
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
- 2025Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Productscited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems
- 2026Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems
- 2025SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems
- 2026Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure
- 2026The Three-Ring Architecture: Governing Agents in the Era of On-Platform Organisations
- 2026AgenticCyOps: Securing Multi-Agentic AI Integration in Enterprise Cyber Operations
- 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
- 2025A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control