Interval and fuzzy physics-augmented neural networks (iPANN and fPANN) for uncertainty quantification and propagation in constitutive modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Constitutive modeling under uncertainty remains a central challenge for reliable mechanics simulations, particularly when the available stress-deformation data are sparse, noisy, or heterogeneous. We propose interval and fuzzy physics-augmented neural networks (iPANNs and fPANNs) for uncertainty-aware hyperelastic constitutive modeling. iPANNs learn sparse lower, mean, and upper free energy density branches whose stresses, obtained by automatic differentiation, ultimately enclose noisy stress observations. In contrast to this deterministic interval description, fPANNs embed the learned iPANN branches into a fuzzy-set representation through membership-level (alpha-cut) interpolation, yielding a nested family of admissible responses. iPANNs and fPANNs encode mechanistic constraints by preserving objectivity, consistency and promoting polyconvexity and, smoothed L0 regularization promoting interpretable energy representations. The bound models are trained through a two-stage transfer-learning procedure in which a sparse mean constitutive response is learned first and then fine-tuned into lower and upper energy branches. We evaluate the framework on synthetic isotropic hyperelastic data with heteroscedastic noise, varying random realizations, shifted noise means, and varying noise magnitudes. The results show that the learned bounds enclose noisy stress observations while generalizing to the test set. Further, we examine the propagation of uncertainty through the mean, upper and lower bound predictions of the learned iPANN models in a finite element setting. The proposed framework provides a compact, physics-consistent route for distribution-free aleatoric uncertainty quantification in hyperelastic constitutive modeling, and propagation in downstream finite element simulations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.
Builds on
32 of 103 references.
References · 32
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 507
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 199
- 2021Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networkscited by 55
20 more
- 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
- 2022A new family of Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks towards automated model discoverycited by 49
- 2023Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physicscited by 46
- 2024A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solidscited by 35
- 2021On physics-informed data-driven isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models through probabilistic machine learning and space-filling samplingcited by 24
- 2022Modular machine learning-based elastoplasticity: generalization in the context of limited datacited by 16
- 2023Extreme sparsification of physics-augmented neural networks for interpretable model discovery in mechanicscited by 16
- 2023On sparse regression, Lp-regularization, and automated model discoverycited by 15
- 2021Interval and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks for uncertain fieldscited by 9
- 2023Stress representations for tensor basis neural networks: alternative formulations to Finger-Rivlin-Ericksencited by 9
- 2025Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approachcited by 8
- 2017Neural Networks for Safety-Critical Applications - Challenges, Experiments and Perspectivescited by 7
- 2025A comparative study of calibration techniques for finite strain elastoplasticity: Numerically-exact sensitivities for FEMU and VFMcited by 6
- 2024Bayesian optimized deep ensemble for uncertainty quantification of deep neural networks: a system safety case study on sodium fast reactor thermal stratification modelingcited by 5
- 2024Improving the performance of Stein variational inference through extreme sparsification of physically-constrained neural network modelscited by 4
- 2025Physics Augmented Machine Learning Discovery of Composition-Dependent Constitutive Laws for 3D Printed Digital Materialscited by 4
- 2024Condensed Stein Variational Gradient Descent for Uncertainty Quantification of Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2026Towards Rapid Constitutive Model Discovery from Multi-Modal Data: Physics Augmented Finite Element Model Updating (paFEMU)cited by 3
- 2022Accurate Prediction and Uncertainty Estimation using Decoupled Prediction Interval Networkscited by 2
- 2025Single- to multi-fidelity history-dependent learning with uncertainty quantification and disentanglement: application to data-driven constitutive modelingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.