mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On sparse regression, Lp-regularization, and automated model discovery

arXiv 2310.06872 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse regression and feature extraction are the cornerstones of knowledge discovery from massive data. Their goal is to discover interpretable and predictive models that provide simple relationships among scientific variables. While the statistical tools for model discovery are well established in the context of linear regression, their generalization to nonlinear regression in material modeling is highly problem-specific and insufficiently understood. Here we explore the potential of neural networks for automatic model discovery and induce sparsity by a hybrid approach that combines two strategies: regularization and physical constraints. We integrate the concept of Lp regularization for subset selection with constitutive neural networks that leverage our domain knowledge in kinematics and thermodynamics. We train our networks with both, synthetic and real data, and perform several thousand discovery runs to infer common guidelines and trends: L2 regularization or ridge regression is unsuitable for model discovery; L1 regularization or lasso promotes sparsity, but induces strong bias; only L0 regularization allows us to transparently fine-tune the trade-off between interpretability and predictability, simplicity and accuracy, and bias and variance. With these insights, we demonstrate that Lp regularized constitutive neural networks can simultaneously discover both, interpretable models and physically meaningful parameters. We anticipate that our findings will generalize to alternative discovery techniques such as sparse and symbolic regression, and to other domains such as biology, chemistry, or medicine. Our ability to automatically discover material models from data could have tremendous applications in generative material design and open new opportunities to manipulate matter, alter properties of existing materials, and discover new materials with user-defined properties.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

12 of 75 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  3. 2021Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networkscited by 55
  4. 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
  5. 2018On the Convergence of the SINDy Algorithmcited by 49
  6. 2022A new family of Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks towards automated model discoverycited by 49
  7. 2023Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physicscited by 46
  8. 2022Automated discovery of generalized standard material models with EUCLIDcited by 31
  9. 2021Data-driven Tissue Mechanics with Polyconvex Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 29
  10. 2021On physics-informed data-driven isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models through probabilistic machine learning and space-filling samplingcited by 24
  11. 2023Data-driven anisotropic finite viscoelasticity using neural ordinary differential equationscited by 16
  12. 2022Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regressioncited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networkscited by 6
  2. 2024Automated Model Discovery for Tensional Homeostasis: Constitutive Machine Learning in Growth and Remodelingcited by 6
  3. 2025Generalized invariants meet constitutive neural networks: A novel framework for hyperelastic materialscited by 3
  4. 2025Automated Constitutive Model Discovery by Pairing Sparse Regression Algorithms with Model Selection Criteriacited by 3
  5. 2026Towards Rapid Constitutive Model Discovery from Multi-Modal Data: Physics Augmented Finite Element Model Updating (paFEMU)cited by 3
  6. 2024Empowering Bayesian Neural Networks with Functional Priors through Anchored Ensembling for Mechanics Surrogate Modeling Applicationscited by 2
  7. 2025Automating modeling in mechanics: LLMs as designers of physics-constrained neural networks for constitutive modeling of materialscited by 2
  8. 2025Discovering uncertainty: Gaussian constitutive neural networks with correlated weightscited by 1
  9. 2025Impilict Runge-Kutta based sparse identification of governing equations in biologically motivated systemscited by 0
  10. 2025Atrial constitutive neural networkscited by 0
  11. 2026LLM-driven design of physics-constrained constitutive models: two agents are better than onecited by 0
  12. 2026Automatic-Differentiation-Enabled Finite Element Model Updating: Learning Constitutive Neural Networks from Structural Deformation Datacited by 0
3 more
  1. 2026CANN-EUCLID: unsupervised constitutive artificial neural network model discovery from full-field datacited by 0
  2. 2026Interval and fuzzy physics-augmented neural networks (iPANN and fPANN) for uncertainty quantification and propagation in constitutive modelingcited by 0
  3. 2026Benchmarking data-driven material models on the classic Treloar datasetcited by 0