mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv 1801.06879 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2018physics.comp-ph cs.CV cs.LGcited by 199

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We are interested in the development of surrogate models for uncertainty quantification and propagation in problems governed by stochastic PDEs using a deep convolutional encoder-decoder network in a similar fashion to approaches considered in deep learning for image-to-image regression tasks. Since normal neural networks are data intensive and cannot provide predictive uncertainty, we propose a Bayesian approach to convolutional neural nets. A recently introduced variational gradient descent algorithm based on Stein's method is scaled to deep convolutional networks to perform approximate Bayesian inference on millions of uncertain network parameters. This approach achieves state of the art performance in terms of predictive accuracy and uncertainty quantification in comparison to other approaches in Bayesian neural networks as well as techniques that include Gaussian processes and ensemble methods even when the training data size is relatively small. To evaluate the performance of this approach, we consider standard uncertainty quantification benchmark problems including flow in heterogeneous media defined in terms of limited data-driven permeability realizations. The performance of the surrogate model developed is very good even though there is no underlying structure shared between the input (permeability) and output (flow/pressure) fields as is often the case in the image-to-image regression models used in computer vision problems. Studies are performed with an underlying stochastic input dimensionality up to 4,225 where most other uncertainty quantification methods fail. Uncertainty propagation tasks are considered and the predictive output Bayesian statistics are compared to those obtained with Monte Carlo estimates.

Key facts. Cited by 199 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 35; 2022: 56; 2023: 44; 2024: 24; 2025: 19; 2026: 21.

199 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 427
  2. 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 414
  3. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  4. 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 343
  5. 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 297
  6. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 283
  7. 2021Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equationscited by 234
  8. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
  9. 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 197
  10. 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
  11. 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 101
  12. 2021PhyCRNet: Physics-informed Convolutional-Recurrent Network for Solving Spatiotemporal PDEscited by 98
38 more
  1. 2021A physics-informed variational DeepONet for predicting the crack path in brittle materialscited by 98
  2. 2022Clifford Neural Layers for PDE Modelingcited by 92
  3. 2024Physics-Informed Diffusion Modelscited by 90
  4. 2022Lie Point Symmetry Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solverscited by 77
  5. 2023Multi-Grid Tensorized Fourier Neural Operator for High-Resolution PDEscited by 68
  6. 2022Learning Deep Implicit Fourier Neural Operators (IFNOs) with Applications to Heterogeneous Material Modelingcited by 65
  7. 2024On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulationscited by 60
  8. 2023CoCoGen: Physically-Consistent and Conditioned Score-based Generative Models for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 56
  9. 2023Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learningcited by 50
  10. 2023Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inferencecited by 46
  11. 2023Fourier-MIONet: Fourier-enhanced multiple-input neural operators for multiphase modeling of geological carbon sequestrationcited by 46
  12. 2022Deep Nonparametric Estimation of Operators between Infinite Dimensional Spacescited by 45
  13. 2022Nonlocal Kernel Network (NKN): a Stable and Resolution-Independent Deep Neural Networkcited by 45
  14. 2022Mitigating spectral bias for the multiscale operator learningcited by 44
  15. 2021Solving PDE-constrained Control Problems Using Operator Learningcited by 42
  16. 2022Learning to Accelerate Partial Differential Equations via Latent Global Evolutioncited by 39
  17. 2021Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNscited by 38
  18. 2021Mosaic Flows: A Transferable Deep Learning Framework for Solving PDEs on Unseen Domainscited by 37
  19. 2022Neural Implicit Flow: a mesh-agnostic dimensionality reduction paradigm of spatio-temporal datacited by 37
  20. 2021Meta-Auto-Decoder for Solving Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 36
  21. 2025Guided Diffusion Sampling on Function Spaces with Applications to PDEscited by 36
  22. 2021Normalizing field flows: Solving forward and inverse stochastic differential equations using physics-informed flow modelscited by 35
  23. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Partial Differential Equations and Related Parameter Identification Problemscited by 34
  24. 2024PDE Generalization of In-Context Operator Networks: A Study on 1D Scalar Nonlinear Conservation Lawscited by 31
  25. 2023Koopman neural operator as a mesh-free solver of non-linear partial differential equationscited by 29
  26. 2021A Deep Learning approach to Reduced Order Modelling of Parameter Dependent Partial Differential Equationscited by 28
  27. 2021Adaptive deep density approximation for Fokker-Planck equationscited by 28
  28. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraintscited by 28
  29. 2022Incremental Spatial and Spectral Learning of Neural Operators for Solving Large-Scale PDEscited by 25
  30. 2022Discovering Nonlinear PDEs from Scarce Data with Physics-encoded Learningcited by 24
  31. 2022Physics-Guided, Physics-Informed, and Physics-Encoded Neural Networks in Scientific Computingcited by 24
  32. 2022Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constantscited by 24
  33. 2024HAMLET: Graph Transformer Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equationscited by 24
  34. 2022PIXEL: Physics-Informed Cell Representations for Fast and Accurate PDE Solverscited by 22
  35. 2025PhysiX: A Foundation Model for Physics Simulationscited by 22
  36. 2022Guiding continuous operator learning through Physics-based boundary constraintscited by 21
  37. 2023Efficient physics-informed neural networks using hash encodingcited by 21
  38. 2023Beyond Regular Grids: Fourier-Based Neural Operators on Arbitrary Domainscited by 21

50 most cited of 199 All 199 (JSON)