The Devil is in the Dark Pixels: Toward Brightness Bias-Robust Denoising
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we reveal an important yet overlooked problem in image denoising: under signal-dependent camera noise models, dark regions suffer from inherently low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), as signal intensity decays far faster than noise variance diminishes, making detail recovery in dark areas fundamentally challenging. Yet rather than compensating for this difficulty, MSE-trained denoisers exacerbate it -- reconstructing dark pixels up to 6x worse relative to their per-band noise floor. This bias stems from two compounding factors: signal-dependent noise inflates bright-pixel residuals, and the network's Jacobian norm increases monotonically with brightness. Together, these cause bright regions to chronically dominate gradient updates at the expense of dark ones. To this end, we propose Brightness Bias-Robust Denoising (BBRD), a drop-in replacement for MSE loss that partitions pixels into brightness bands, normalizes per-band error by empirical noise variance, and applies Group Distributionally Robust Optimization (Group-DRO) to dynamically upweight whichever band is currently worst, with zero additional parameters or inference cost. Across 8 architectures and 2 datasets in our experiments, BBRD is the only method among 13 tested alternatives that improves each brightness band simultaneously, achieving up to +0.45 dB on dark bands, +0.32 dB on bright bands, and +0.65 dB aggregate Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) on SIDD, with the largest per-band gains in the darkest regions where detail recovery matters most. Code is available at https://github.com/xmed-lab/BBRD
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
References · 25
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,887
- 2021Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restorationcited by 1,627
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2021Uformer: A General U-Shaped Transformer for Image Restorationcited by 866
- 2022Simple Baselines for Image Restorationcited by 708
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
- 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 470
- 2024MambaIR: A Simple Baseline for Image Restoration with State-Space Modelcited by 352
13 more
- 2024One-Step Effective Diffusion Network for Real-World Image Super-Resolutioncited by 246
- 2020Focal Frequency Loss for Image Reconstruction and Synthesiscited by 206
- 2024MambaIRv2: Attentive State Space Restorationcited by 94
- 2024TSD-SR: One-Step Diffusion with Target Score Distillation for Real-World Image Super-Resolutioncited by 87
- 2022Practical Blind Image Denoising via Swin-Conv-UNet and Data Synthesiscited by 86
- 2018Real-world Noisy Image Denoising: A New Benchmarkcited by 74
- 2023Image Denoising: The Deep Learning Revolution and Beyond -- A Survey Paper --cited by 71
- 2020Wavelet-Based Dual-Branch Network for Image Demoireingcited by 55
- 2023KBNet: Kernel Basis Network for Image Restorationcited by 33
- 2024NTIRE 2024 Challenge on Low Light Image Enhancement: Methods and Resultscited by 26
- 2025The Tenth NTIRE 2025 Image Denoising Challenge Reportcited by 21
- 2023Guided Frequency Loss for Image Restorationcited by 3
- 2025AIM 2025 Challenge on Real-World RAW Image Denoisingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.